Last month, U.S. Bankruptcy Chief Judge Cecelia Morris of the Southern District of New York entered a decision granting summary judgment to pro se debtor, Kevin Jared Rosenberg, finding that Rosenberg had satisfied the “undue hardship” standard set forth in Section 523(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code, and ordering the discharge of Rosenberg’s student loan debt of more than $220,000 in Rosenberg v. New York State Higher Education Services (In re Rosenberg),  Case No. 18-35379 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2020).

The ‘Brunner’ Test

The notion that student loans are generally nondischargeable in bankruptcy is, perhaps, one of the more familiar principles of bankruptcy law, even to nonlawyers. This concept has evolved from the case of Brunner v. New York State Higher Education Services (In re Brunner), 831 F.2d 395 (2d. Cir. 1987), which established a relatively straightforward three-pronged test:

  • That the debtor cannot maintain, based on current income and expenses, a “minimal” standard of living for himself and his dependents if forced to repay the loans;
  • That additional circumstances exist indicating that this state of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion of the repayment period of the student loans; and
  • That the debtor has made good faith efforts to repay the loans.

Background