X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Prescription Medical Device Photo: Koldunov Alexey/Shutterstock.com

In a decision wading into the ramifications of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Tincher v. Omega Flex, a federal judge has rejected efforts to carve out an exception to strict liability law for the makers of prescription medical devices.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Max Mitchell

Max Mitchell is a reporter with The Legal Intelligencer, focusing on litigation in Pennsylvania with a specific emphasis on Philadelphia courts. Follow him on Twitter @MMitchellTLI. His email is mmitchell@alm.com.

More from this author

Law Firms Mentioned

 

Pennsylvania Products LiabilityBook

Pennsylvania Products Liability provides an authoritative and comprehensive review of Pennsylvania product liability law. This area of law has undergone dramatic changes ...

Get More Information
 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.