Photo: Shutterstock
This story is reprinted with permission from the Insurance Coverage Law Center, the industry’s only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage law professionals. Visit the website to subscribe.
An appellate court in Pennsylvania has ruled that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Gallagher decision did not benefit an insured who sought underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits where he had not preserved any claim that the so-called household exclusion in his automobile insurance policy was unenforceable.
