A Pittsburgh federal judge has ruled that a Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion that restricted insurance companies from using the household exclusion to decline stacking of coverage should not be extended to also bar use of the “regular use” exclusion in the same way.

The decision, which may be the first word from the federal courts on the hotly debated issue, appears to contradict a growing trend in Pennsylvania law.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]