Pennsylvania’s federal courts have been bustling with litigation filed against public-sector unions in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 27, 2018, decision in Janus v. AFSCME, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018).

Prior to Janus, Pennsylvania, like many other states, permitted public-sector employers and unions to negotiate collective-bargaining provisions requiring nonunion members to pay their “fair share” of the cost of representing them to the union, in lieu of the full membership dues paid by union members. Part of the reason for this was because nonmembers would otherwise receive the benefit of union advocacy without paying for it. This is so, because a duly-elected public-sector bargaining representative must advocate for and represent all bargaining-unit employees, not just union members.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]