Photo: Shutterstock.com
The Pennsylvania Superior Court has upheld summary judgment in favor of a snow removal business sued for negligence, reasoning that the company is protected by the "hills and ridges" doctrine.
August 29, 2019 at 02:24 PM
1 minute read
The Pennsylvania Superior Court has upheld summary judgment in favor of a snow removal business sued for negligence, reasoning that the company is protected by the “hills and ridges” doctrine.
A three-judge panel of the Superior Court consisting of Judges John Bender, Alice Dubow and Kate Ford Elliott affirmed the ruling of a Warren County judge in James M. Hare Jr.’s lawsuit against Mark Zaffino Snow Removal.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
