Photo: Shutterstock
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to hold argument as to the correctness of a ruling that general contractor overhead and profit was not required to be factored into two homeowners’ actual cash value settlements with their insurer for water damage to their properties.
June 05, 2019 at 02:51 PM
1 minute read
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to hold argument as to the correctness of a ruling that general contractor overhead and profit (GCOP) was not required to be factored into two homeowners’ actual cash value settlements with their insurer for water damage to their properties.
On May 29, the justices granted allocatur in Wintersteen v. Truck Insurance Exchange on a single issue:
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Duane Morris LLP seeks a highly motivated junior associate to join its dynamic and growing Labor and Employment Class Action group in Chicag...
Duane Morris LLP seeks a full-time staff litigation attorney who has practiced between 3-5 years. Experience will include drafting motions, ...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
