Does an insurance carrier need to provide coverage for a man who was accidentally shot while intervening in a murder-suicide?
That question is one the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to consider.
4 minute read
Photo: Shutterstock
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether an insurance carrier needs to provide coverage for a man who was accidentally shot while intervening in a murder-suicide.
July 12, 2018 at 02:31 PM
1 minute read
Bureau Chief
Does an insurance carrier need to provide coverage for a man who was accidentally shot while intervening in a murder-suicide?
That question is one the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to consider.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
