Editor’s note: This is the second in a two-part series.

In last week’s article, I discussed the Sedona Conference and the “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(b)(2) Primer: Practice Pointers for Responding to Discovery Requests,” 19 Sedona Conf. J. 447. The publication was the conference’s final version of its Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(b)(2) primer, a project of The Working Group on Electronic Document Retention and Production (WG1). In this week’s article, I continue to look at some of the primer’s takes on discovery requests and responses to see the primer’s strengths and weaknesses.

  • Responses to requests for productions.