Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
After selling a firearm to a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives' confidential informant, appellant was arrested during a routine visit with his supervisor parole officer for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He pled guilty.
Appellant contested the trial court's final judgment favoring appellee, arguing it did not strictly comply with the parties' Rule 11 settlement agreement and was rendered without proper inquiry into his consent.
The case originated from a 2011 contract between appellant Boswell and appellee Kinder, the owner of appellees Pappy's Pet Lodge LLC and Pappy's Franchising LLC, under which appellant was to provide franchise consulting services to Pappy's, with compensation including a percentage of franchised locations' gross revenue. Despite appellant ceasing services in 2012 after being informed by Kinder that Pappy's would not pursue franchising, appellant later discovered that Pappy's had sold franchises and sought royalties he believed were due
Appellant appealed his conviction for the second-degree felony offense of possession of methamphetamine, arguing the evidence was insufficient to prove the substance in his possession was a controlled form of methamphetamine under Texas law.
Appellants Corey Duffey, Jarvis Ross, and Tony Hewitt were initially convicted in 2009 for numerous counts related to conspiracy, attempted bank robbery, bank robbery, and using a firearm in furtherance thereof.
In a legal dispute involving a claim to an easement for the use of an airstrip on property purportedly owned by appellee Bishop Airfield Ranch, LLC, appellant Carol Shaw appealed a summary judgment granted by the trial court in favor of appellee.
This case grew out of a joint venture between two men who agreed to purchase expensive equipment jointly and that all proceeds would be split evenly after business expenses.