Editor’s note: What follows is brief information regarding some of the patent suits filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas from Nov. 7 to Nov. 13, as listed on PACER, the federal courts’ online filing system.

Charge Lion LLC v. Linear Technology Corp.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00858-LED
Date Filed: Nov. 7
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,543,702, entitled “Alkaline Battery Charging Method and Battery Charger.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Hao Ni, Timothy T. Wang and Stevenson Moore V, Ni Law Firm, Dallas

Charge Lion LLC v. STMicroelectronics NV, STMicroelectronics Inc. and ST-Ericsson Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00859-LED
Date Filed: Nov. 7
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,543,702, entitled “Alkaline Battery Charging Method and Battery Charger.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Hao Ni, Timothy T. Wang and Stevenson Moore V, Ni Law Firm, Dallas

Charge Lion LLC v. Microchip Technology Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00860-LED
Date Filed: Nov. 7
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,543,702, entitled “Alkaline Battery Charging Method and Battery Charger.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Hao Ni, Timothy T. Wang and Stevenson Moore V, Ni Law Firm, Dallas

Charge Lion LLC v. Skyworks Solutions Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00861-LED
Date Filed: Nov. 7
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,543,702, entitled “Alkaline Battery Charging Method and Battery Charger.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Hao Ni, Timothy T. Wang and Stevenson Moore V, Ni Law Firm, Dallas

Charge Lion LLC v. Texas Instruments Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00862-LED
Date Filed: Nov. 7
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,543,702, entitled “Alkaline Battery Charging Method and Battery Charger.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Hao Ni, Timothy T. Wang and Stevenson Moore V, Ni Law Firm, Dallas

Beeline.com Inc. v. nextSource Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00708-JRG
Date Filed: Nov. 9
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,742,002, entitled “Computer-Implemented and/or Computer-Assisted Web Database and/or Interaction System for Staffing of Personnel in Various Employment Related Fields.”
Plaintiff’s Attorney: Joseph J. Richetti, Bryan Cave, New York

Clear With Computers LLC v. Hugo Boss Fashions Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00867-LED
Date Filed: Nov. 9
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,266,015, entitled “Inventory Sales System and Method.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; Stamatios Stamoulis and Richard C. Weinblatt, Stamoulis & Weinblatt, Wilmington, Del.

Clear With Computers LLC v. Tory Burch LLC
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00868-LED
Date Filed: Nov. 9
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,266,015, entitled “Inventory Sales System and Method.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; Stamatios Stamoulis and Richard C. Weinblatt, Stamoulis & Weinblatt, Wilmington, Del.

ICON Health & Fitness Inc. v. Johnson Health Tech North America Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00709-JRG
Date Filed: Nov. 9
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,702,719, entitled “PASSPORT Device” and U.S. Patent No. 8,298,123, entitled “LIVETRACK Interactive Technology.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Larry R. Laycock, David R. Wright and Kirk R. Harris, Maschoff Gilmore & Israelson, Park City, Utah; James N. Willi and Tracy J. Willi, Willi Law Firm, Austin

Patent Group LLC v. W. W. Grainger Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00707-JRG
Date Filed: Nov. 9
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,603,490, entitled “Web Site Screen Rotation.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Stafford Davis, The Stafford Davis Firm, Tyler; John F. “Jack” Walker and Marisa Schouten, Martin Walker, Tyler

PrivaCash Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00869-LED
Date Filed: Nov. 9
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,219,474, entitled “Method and System for Distributing and Activating a Non-Personalized Purchase Card.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Thomas A. Lewry, John M. Halan and John S. Le Roy, Brooks Kushman, Southfield, Mich.; T. John Ward Jr. and J. Wesley Hill, Ward & Smith Law Firm, Longview

CSG Systems Inc. v. TOA Technologies Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00712
Date Filed: Nov. 12
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,990,458 and U.S. Patent No. 7,725,344, both entitled “System and Method for Computer-Aided Technician Dispatch and Communication.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Lee F. Johnston, Dorsey & Whitney, Denver.; John M. Pickett, Law Offices of John Pickett, Texarkana

NovelPoint Tracking LLC v. Apple Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00713
Date Filed: Nov. 12
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,442,485, entitled “Method and Apparatus for an Automatic Vehicle Location, Collision Notification, and Synthetic Voice.”
Plaintiff’s Attorney: Everett Upshaw, Law Office of Everett Upshaw, Dallas

NovelPoint Tracking LLC v. HTC America Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00715
Date Filed: Nov. 12
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,442,485, entitled “Method and Apparatus for an Automatic Vehicle Location, Collision Notification, and Synthetic Voice.”
Plaintiff’s Attorney: Everett Upshaw, Law Office of Everett Upshaw, Dallas

NovelPoint Tracking LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00716
Date Filed: Nov. 12
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,442,485, entitled “Method and Apparatus for an Automatic Vehicle Location, Collision Notification, and Synthetic Voice.”
Plaintiff’s Attorney: Everett Upshaw, Law Office of Everett Upshaw, Dallas

NovelPoint Tracking LLC v. Research in Motion Corp.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00714
Date Filed: Nov. 12
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,442,485, entitled “Method and Apparatus for an Automatic Vehicle Location, Collision Notification, and Synthetic Voice.”
Plaintiff’s Attorney: Everett Upshaw, Law Office of Everett Upshaw, Dallas

Rotatable Technologies LLC v. HTC America Inc., Coby Electronics Corp., LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A. Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., Pandigital Inc., Viewsonic Corp. and Vizio Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00718
Date Filed: Nov. 13
Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,326,978, entitled “Display Method for Selectively Rotating Windows on a Computer Display.”
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Hao Ni, Timothy T. Wang and Stevenson Moore V, Ni Law Firm, Dallas