Editor’s note: What follows is brief information regarding some of the patent suits filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas from Aug. 22 to Aug. 28, as listed on PACER, the federal courts’ online filing system.

Blue Spike LLC v. Yahoo! Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00556-LED
Date filed: Aug. 22

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S. Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S. Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S. Patent No. 8,214,175, all titled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Albritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.

Blue Spike LLC v. Civolution USA Inc. and Civolution B.V.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00557-LED
Date filed: Aug. 22

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S. Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S. Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S. Patent No. 8,214,175, all titled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Albritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.

Blue Spike LLC v. Google Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00558-LED
Date filed: Aug. 22

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S. Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S. Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S. Patent No. 8,214,175, all titled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Albritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.

Blue Spike LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00564-LED
Date filed: Aug. 22

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S. Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S. Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S. Patent No. 8,214,175, all titled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Albritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.

Blue Spike LLC v. Umami Co.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00565-LED
Date filed: Aug. 22

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S. Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S. Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S. Patent No. 8,214,175, all titled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Albritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.

Allergan Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.; Alcon Research Ltd., Alcon Laboratories Inc. and Falcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd.; Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp.; and Watson Laboratories Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00500-JRG
Date filed: Aug. 23

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,133,890 entitled “Combination of brimonidine and timolol for topical ophthalmic use.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Gregory P. Love and Todd Y. Brandt, Stevens Love, Longview; Juanita Brooks, Fish & Richardson, San Diego, Calif.; Jonathan E. Singer and Deanna J. Reichel, Fish & Richardson, Minneapolis; W. Chad Shear and Susan M. Coletti, Fish & Richardson, Wilmington, Del.

TQP Development LLC v. The Weather Channel LLC
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00502-MHS-CMC
Date filed: Aug. 23

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,412,730 entitled “Encrypted Data Transmission System Employing Means for Randomly Altering the Encryption Keys.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Marc A. Fenster, Kevin P. Burke, Adam S. Hoffman and Alexander C.D. Giza, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles.; Hao Ni, Ni Law Firm, Dallas; Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.

TQP Development LLC v. Twitter Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00503-MHS-CMC
Date filed: Aug. 23

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,412,730 entitled “Encrypted Data Transmission System Employing Means for Randomly Altering the Encryption Keys.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Marc A. Fenster, Kevin P. Burke, Adam S. Hoffman and Alexander C.D. Giza, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles; Hao Ni, Ni Law Firm, Dallas; Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.

TQP Development LLC v. Dow Jones & Co. Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00504-MHS-CMC
Date filed: Aug. 23

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,412,730 entitled “Encrypted Data Transmission System Employing Means for Randomly Altering the Encryption Keys.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Marc A. Fenster, Kevin P. Burke, Adam S. Hoffman and Alexander C.D. Giza, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles; Hao Ni, Ni Law Firm, Dallas; Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.

TQP Development LLC v. NBA Media Ventures LLC; Turner Digital Basketball Services Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00505-MHS-CMC
Date filed: Aug. 23

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,412,730 entitled “Encrypted Data Transmission System Employing Means for Randomly Altering the Encryption Keys.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Marc A. Fenster, Kevin P. Burke, Adam S. Hoffman and Alexander C.D. Giza, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles; Hao Ni, Ni Law Firm, Dallas; Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.

TQP Development LLC v. NET-A-PORTER LLC
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00506-MHS-CMC
Date filed: Aug. 23

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,412,730 entitled “Encrypted Data Transmission System Employing Means for Randomly Altering the Encryption Keys.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Marc A. Fenster, Kevin P. Burke, Adam S. Hoffman and Alexander C.D. Giza, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles; Hao Ni, Ni Law Firm, Dallas; Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.

TQP Development LLC v. Simply Hired Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00507-MHS-CMC
Date filed: Aug. 23

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,412,730 entitled “Encrypted Data Transmission System Employing Means for Randomly Altering the Encryption Keys.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Marc A. Fenster, Kevin P. Burke, Adam S. Hoffman and Alexander C.D. Giza, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles; Hao Ni, Ni Law Firm, Dallas; Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.

Blue Spike LLC v. Irdeto USA Inc. and Irdeto B.V.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00567-LED
Date filed: Aug. 23

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S. Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S Patent No. 8,214,175 all titled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Albritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.

Blue Spike LLC v. Zeitera LLC, Ensequence Inc. and Related Content Database Inc. d/b/a Watchwith
Civil Action No:6:12-cv-00568-LED
Date filed: Aug. 23

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S. Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S Patent No. 8,214,175 all titled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Albritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.

Blue Spike LLC v. Wioffer LLC
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00570
Date filed: Aug. 23

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S. Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S Patent No. 8,214,175 all titled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Albritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.

TQP Development LLC v. Pioneer Electronics Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00508-MHS-CMC
Date filed: Aug. 24

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,412,730 entitled “Encrypted Data Transmission System Employing Means for Randomly Altering the Encryption Keys.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Marc A. Fenster, Kevin P. Burke, Adam S. Hoffman and Alexander C.D. Giza, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles; Hao Ni, Ni Law Firm, Dallas; Andrew W. Spangler, Spangler & Fussell, Longview; James A. Fussell III, Spangler & Fussell, Alexandria, Va.

RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd. and RMail Ltd. v. Constant Contact Inc.
Civil Action No:2:12-cv-00510-JRG
Date filed: Aug. 24

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”

Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel

RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd. and RMail Ltd. v. Epsilon Data Management LLC
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00511-JRG
Date filed: Aug. 24

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”

Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel

RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd. and RMail Ltd. v. ExactTarget Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00512-JRG
Date filed: Aug. 24

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”

Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel

RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd. and RMail Ltd. v. Experian PLC and Experian Information Solutions Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00513-JRG
Date filed: Aug. 24

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”

Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel

RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd. and RMail Ltd. v. Responsys Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00514-JRG
Date filed: Aug. 24

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”

Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel

RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd. and RMail Ltd. v. StrongMail Systems Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00515-JRG
Date filed: Aug. 24

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”

Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel

RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd. and RMail Ltd. v. Vocus Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00516-JRG
Date filed: Aug. 24

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”

Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel

RPost Holdings Inc., RPost Communications Ltd. and RMail Ltd. v. Infogroup Inc. and Yesmail Interactive
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00517-JRG
Date filed: Aug. 24

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,372, U.S. Patent No. 8,161,104, U.S. Patent No. 8,209,389 and U.S. Patent No. 8,224,913, all entitled “System and Method for Verifying Delivery and Integrity of Electronic Messages,” and U.S. Patent No. 6,182,219 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents.”

Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Winston O. Huff, Navarro Huff, Dallas; Lewis E. Hudnell III, Colvin Hudnell, New York, of counsel

Blue Calypso Inc. v. LivingSocial Inc.
Civil Action No: 2:12-cv-00518
Date filed: Aug. 24

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,664,516 and U.S. Patent No. 8,155,679, both entitled “Method and System for Peer-to-Peer Advertising Between Mobile Communication Devices.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Melissa Richards Smith, Gillam & Smith, Marshall; W. Bryan Farney, Steven R. Daniels and Bryan D. Atkinson, Farney Daniels, Georgetown

Blue Spike LLP v. Technicolor USA Inc. and Technicolor SA
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00572-LED
Date filed: Aug. 24

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S. Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S. Patent No. 8,214,175, all entitled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Abritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.

Optigenex Inc. v. Jeunesse Global Holdings LLC, Jeunesse LLC, Vincent Giampapa, Nathan Newman and Vitaquest International Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00573-LED
Date filed: Aug. 24

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,238,675 and U.S. Patent No. 6,361,805, both entitled “Method of Preparation and Composition of a Water Soluble Extract of the Plant Species Uncaria for Enhancing Immune, Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Tumor Processes of Warm Blooded Animals”; U.S. Patent No. 6,964,784, U.S. Patent No. 7,595,064 and U.S. Patent No. 7,947,312, all entitled “Method of Preparation and Composition of a Water Soluble Extract of the Bioactive Component of the Plant Species Uncaria for Enhancing Immune, Anti-Inflammatory, Anti-Tumor and DNA Repair Processes of Warm Blooded Animals”; and U.S. Patent No. 7,955,626 “Method for Enhancing the DNA Repair Process, Treating Disorders Associated with the DNA Repair Process, Enhancing Anti-Tumor Response and Treating Disorders Associated with Anti-Tumor Response in Mammals by Administering Purified Quinic Acid and/or Carboxy Alkyl Ester.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Andrew T. Gorham, Robert M. Parker, Robert Christopher Bunt and Charles Ainsworth, Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth, Tyler; David W. Denenberg, Davidoff Hutcher & Citron, Garden City, N.Y.

Blue Spike LLP v. Audible Magic Corp., Facebook Inc., MySpace LLC and Specific Media LLC, Photobucket.com Inc., Dailymotion Inc. and Dailymotion S.A., Soundcloud Inc. and Soundcloud Ltd., Myxer Inc., Qlipso Inc. and Qlipso Media Networks Ltd., Yap.tv Inc., GoMiso Inc., iMesh Inc., Metacafe Inc., Boodabee Technologies Inc., TuneCore Inc., Zedge Holdings Inc., Harmonix Music Systems Inc., Brightcove Inc., Coincident.TV Inc. and MediaFire LLC
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00576-LED
Date filed: Aug. 27

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S. Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S. Patent No. 8,214,175, all entitled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Abritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.

Blue Spike LLP v. Rovi Corp. and Rovi Guides Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00577-LED
Date filed: Aug. 27

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S. Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S. Patent No. 8,214,175, all entitled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Abritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. MediaTek Inc., MediaTek USA Inc., Ralink Technology Corp. (USA), Ralink Technology Corp. (Taiwan), Realtek Semiconductor Corp., Texas Instruments Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Barnes & Noble Inc., Nokia Corp., Nokia Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America LLC and Samsung Telecommunications America LLC
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00578-LED
Date filed: Aug. 27

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,487,069 entitled “Wireless LAN.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: James M. Wagstaffe, Michael Ng, Daniel A. Zaheer and Maria Radwick, Kerr & Wagstaffe, San Francisco; S. Calvin Capshaw, Elizabeth L. DeRieux and D. Jeffrey Rambin, Capshaw DeRieux, Gladewater; Frederick G. Michaud, Capshaw DeRieux, Washington, D.C.; Michael F. Heim, Nate Davis and Miranda Y. Jones, Heimm Payne & Chorush, Houston

Blue Spike LLP v. YouWeb LLC, YouWeb Accelerator LLC and YouWeb Entrepreneur LLC
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00580-LED
Date filed: Aug. 28

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S. Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S. Patent No. 8,214,175, all entitled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Abritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.

Blue Spike LLP v. SMRTV Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00581-LED
Date filed: Aug. 28

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S. Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S. Patent No. 8,214,175, all entitled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Abritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.

Blue Spike LLP v. ACTV8 Inc.
Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-00582-LED
Date filed: Aug. 28

Cause of Action: Filed for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,472, U.S. Patent No. 7,660,700, U.S Patent No. 7,949,494 and U.S. Patent No. 8,214,175, all entitled “Method and Device for Monitoring and Analyzing Signals.”

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Eric M. Albritton, Stephen E. Edwards and Michael A. Benefield, Abritton Law Firm, Longview; Randall T. Garteiser, Christopher A. Honea and Christopher S. Johns, Garteiser Honea, San Rafael, Calif.