The alleged negligent activity, mopping the bathroom floor, was not ongoing at the time and place appellant fell. There is no evidence that the negligent activity itself caused appellant's injuries or that her fall was contemporaneous with the mopping. Rather, all the evidence indicates that appellant slipped on a condition caused by the mopping activity, which she was warned about. Therefore, appellee is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Texarkana Court of Appeals, No. 06-09-00080-CV, 01-22-2010
January 25, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Borteck & Czapek, P.C., based in Florham Park, is a boutique estates and trusts law firm specializing in estate planning and administrat...
Gwinnett County State Court is seeking an attorney to assist the Judge by conducting a variety of legal research, analysis, and document pre...
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
