Texas Supreme Court justices grilled a state attorney on the state’s rationale for why a $16 million judgment should be upheld on a summary judgment motion in a Medicaid fraud case where there was no loss.
The court heard oral argument in Richard J. Malouf, D.D.S. v. State of Texas, a case where the state obtained final judgment at the summary judgment phase on allegations a dentist used his Texas Provider Identifier (TPI) number for services provided by other dentists.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
