Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex, seat of the New Jersey Supreme Court. Courtesy photo

The outlook is uncertain for a suit claiming pelvic mesh users paid excessive legal fees in multidistrict litigation, after the New Jersey Supreme Court declined to provide guidance in a choice-of-law dispute.

The Supreme Court denied a request from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for guidance on whether Texas or New Jersey contingency rules should apply to suits filed in a New Jersey court on behalf of lawyers from Texas.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.