The New Jersey Supreme Court denied a request from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for guidance on whether Texas or New Jersey contingency rules should apply to suits filed in a New Jersey court on behalf of lawyers from Texas.
April 13, 2021 at 02:24 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
The outlook is uncertain for a suit claiming pelvic mesh users paid excessive legal fees in multidistrict litigation, after the New Jersey Supreme Court declined to provide guidance in a choice-of-law dispute.
The Supreme Court denied a request from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for guidance on whether Texas or New Jersey contingency rules should apply to suits filed in a New Jersey court on behalf of lawyers from Texas.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex, seat of the New Jersey Supreme Court. Courtesy photo
