A recent venue decision from the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals should concern all patent owners. The opinion in In re Apple, Case No. 2020-135 (CAFC Nov. 9, 2020), highlights how big tech companies enjoy the Texas business climate but seek to avoid its legal system. It also undermines the wisdom of having specialized patent courts efficiently resolve complex patent disputes. Finally, it creates the appearance that mandamus should be a common remedy through which the appellate court can reevaluate the entirety of a district court’s original analysis.

When Apple was sued for patent infringement in the Waco Division of the Western District of Texas, the tech giant claimed that  the venue was not convenient because there was “no relevant” evidence in and no connection to the Western District of Texas.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]