Battle for the Texas Bar: After Losing by 37 Votes, Candidate in Bar President-Elect Race Calls for Recount, Runoff
Pablo Almaguer of Edinburg requested a recount and argued for a runoff election because Sylvia Borunda Firth of El Paso won the State Bar of Texas president-elect election with 49.31% of the vote, rather than a majority vote.
June 01, 2020 at 06:00 PM
3 minute read
The State Bar of Texas announced that El Paso lawyer Sylvia Borunda Firth, who garnered 37 more votes than her opponent, has won the race for president-elect.
But Firth's opponent, Pablo Almaguer of Edinburg, is calling for a recount and runoff election, arguing that neither candidate won a majority of the vote, which is required in the Texas Bar policy manual.
Out of 19,298 cast ballots, Firth won 9,515 votes, or 49.31%, while Almaguer won 9,478 votes, or 49.11%, according to election results.
Also, 1.58% went to write-in candidates.
|'No Candidate Met That Mark'
If Firth's election stands, she would be the first Hispanic woman to serve as Texas Bar president, and the first El Paso attorney elected to the position.
"The reason I threw my hat in the ring is I very much wanted to see diversity in leadership at the state bar," said Firth, adding that diversity, to her, meant gender, race, and also practice areas and geography in Texas. "Far West Texas—it's really hard to get elected from here. Several people have tried. I really wanted to take the opportunity to represent this part of the state."
There has never been an election contest or challenge in Texas Bar history, although races have come very close in the past, said an email by spokesman Lowell Brown. In 2008, Roland Johnson won election with 49.92% of the vote, compared with 49.27% to Claude Ducloux, he explained.
In an email Sunday, Almaguer requested a recount from Texas Bar president Randy Sorrels and executive director Trey Apffel. He argued that the Texas Bar's policy manual contains a provision that the president-elect must win election by a "majority of all votes cast by members."
"No candidate met that mark," Almaguer wrote. "The policy manual mandates a runoff election."
|Low Turnout
Almaguer, director of private bar and government relations at Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, said in an interview that the bar's nominations and elections subcommittee would review his arguments and make a decision.
He said the attorneys who voted for him have been asking questions about the issue of the lack of a majority vote, and he felt they deserved an answer. Almaguer added that he planned to accept whatever interpretation of the bar policy manual that the subcommittee decided upon.
"I'm not going to file anything in court, and I'm not going to challenge anything," he said.
Firth said she doesn't think a runoff election is appropriate.
"I think it does a disservice to the bar, to challenge on that basis," Firth said. "There's no way there is a runoff with the same two candidates."
The coronavirus made for a strange election season for the Texas Bar. As the state closed down in March, both candidates ceased in-person campaigning. Because the bar's election vendor is headquartered in New York City, and its staff could not come to the office, the bar chose to eliminate paper ballots and move to online-only voting, with an extended voting period.
The voter turnout was only 18%, which is the lowest turnout in the past five years. That's a drop of six percentage points compared to the 2019 turnout of 24%.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher Partner Moves to Vinson & Elkins as Co-Head of Strategic M&A
3 minute readLatham, Kirkland Alums Land the Top GC Posts—Here's What It Means for Business Generation
10 minute readPartner Pay Transparency Is Eroding, Even if 'Black Box' Systems Haven't Caught On
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250