COVID-19 Hasn't Wrecked Auto Accident Lawyers' Earnings Yet. But a Crash Is Coming
In a national survey, 58% of car wreck lawyers said their income stayed the same during the COVID-19 pandemic, but it flips on the head in terms of future income expectations. There were 71% who expected a future drop in earnings. Why?
May 26, 2020 at 08:41 AM
4 minute read
(Photo: tommaso79/Shutterstock.com)
People stay at home. Highways have fewer cars. One result? Fewer auto collisions.
That means fewer lawsuits.
And less income for plaintiff lawyers who handle that litigation.
"During the shutdown, I saw images of Mopac from 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. on a Friday—it was wide open," Austin solo practitioner Joe Lopez said about a busy highway in the Texas capital city. "If there's no cars on the road, then yes, the case intake will go down, and you will see a reflected downturn in revenue in six, nine or 12 months. It's still a ways out. You have not been through that cycle quite yet."
In a survey by ALM Media that examined how the coronavirus pandemic is impacting attorneys' incomes, 58% of the 45 motor vehicle attorneys who responded said their income has stayed the same during the pandemic—the largest rate of any practice area polled. These respondents came from Connecticut, Texas, Georgia, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Florida and New York.
However, that figure flipped on its head when attorneys predicted their future income: 71% of the lawyers said they are expecting a decrease.
View the results:
Graphic: David Palmer/ALM
Lawsuit Pipeline
Why haven't motor vehicle injury lawyers already felt the pinch from the coronavirus?
It's because the cases that are paying out now have been in the pipeline since before the pandemic, Lopez explained.
"Those were already produced goods, if you think of it from a factory-output standpoint," he said.
But it's new cases that are taking a hit.
Clients have stopped calling these lawyers: 73% of respondents told us they're getting fewer contacts from potential clients seeking representation.
Attorneys also are seeing decreases in new case numbers. When we asked how their case volumes have already changed, 62% of the motor vehicle lawyers reported a current decreased.
Pennsylvania defense attorney Daniel E. Cummins, who represents the insured defendants in collision cases, said his insurance company clients are already cutting the number of assignments they give Cummins' firm.
Cummins said he thinks more claims are settling before they get to the litigation stage.
"Some insurance companies are reaching out to plaintiffs' attorneys to settle cases. Some plaintiffs' attorneys may need to settle cases to keep the cash flow running and keep their offices running and take care of their overhead," he said. "Also, you have plaintiffs out of work because their places of employment are shut down. They may need a quick boost to their bank account. All those factors may come together to make all the parties involved more willing to reach an amicable solution."
Another reason that plaintiffs counsel are filing fewer lawsuits now is because it's harder to get clients' medical records from health care providers that are closed down or running on skeleton crews, said Guy Choate, a partner at Webb, Stokes & Sparks in San Angelo, Texas.
The silver lining is that Choate said he does not view the future as bleak. People will start having car collisions again, and there will be work for lawyers.
The survey showed that motor vehicle lawyers do expect clients to pick up the phones again—somewhat. Even though 60% still expected fewer calls, there were 18% of the 45 attorneys who thought they'd get more client calls in the future.
"Obviously, nothing like this has happened in any of our lifetimes. But if the experience shows us anything, it's that we will prevail and come back," said Choate. "It's the nature of the contingent fee practice: You have good years and bad years. We've been here a long time, and a 30% or 50% drop is really something we would rather not have, but we will survive."
Read more:
The Numbers Are in: Attorney Income Nosedived Nationwide in the Last 2 Months
Florida Criminal Defense Lawyers Eyeing Civil Work? How COVID-19 is Affecting Attorney Income
Connecticut Lawyers Brace for Sharp Drop in Income This Year
Family Lawyers, Criminal Law Attorneys Are Hurting Worst Than Others in COVID-19 Economy
Recession-Proof? Debt and Contract Lawyers Are Weathering the Coronavirus Storm Better Than Others
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
State Bar Ethics Opinion Determines Texas Lawyers Can't Join a Firm With Non-Lawyer Partners
2 minute read
Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America


Haynes and Boone Expands in New York With 7-Lawyer Seward & Kissel Fund Finance, Securitization Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1CFPB Labor Union Files Twin Lawsuits Seeking to Prevent Agency's Closure
- 2Crypto Crime Down, Hacks Up: Lawyers Warned of 2025 Security Shake-Up
- 3Atlanta Calling: National Law Firms Flock to a ‘Hotbed for Talented Lawyers’
- 4Privacy Suit Targets Education Department Over Disclosure of Student Financial Data to DOGE
- 5Colwell Law Group Founder Has Died in Skiing Accident
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250