X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Kenneth Starr (left) and Paul Clement (Photos: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM) Kenneth Starr (left) and Paul Clement (Photos: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)

A federal panel reviewing a $1.04 billion hip implant verdict appeared skeptical about Johnson & Johnson’s arguments that a Dallas judge had no jurisdiction over a trial involving five California plaintiffs.

This premium content is locked for
Texas Lawyer subscribers only.

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to groupsales@alm.com to learn more.

Amanda Bronstad

Amanda Bronstad is the ALM staff reporter covering class actions and mass torts nationwide. She writes the email dispatch Critical Mass. She is based in Los Angeles.

More from this author

Lean Adviser Legal

Think Lean Daily Message

"Facts are what they are. You can t make them, manage them or control them. But what we can do is try to find them and figure out how to live with them. But future events are essentially fickle. The requirement is not investigation, it is risk assessment, and the techniques are quite different. And opinions are unlike either of the above. They are the view from inside someone s head, someone who matters. And sometimes you can change them."

Learn More

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2018 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.