Statements by very young children or to persons other than law enforcement officials will rarely trigger a criminal defendant’s right to confront his accuser at trial, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday.

In Ohio v. Clark, the unanimous high court held that the introduction at trial of a 3-year-old child’s statements to teachers who suspected he had been abused did not violate the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]