Justices Say No Challenges to Grand Juries on Frozen Assets
An indicted criminal defendant has no constitutional right to challenge the government's pretrial freezing of assets needed to hire a lawyer, a divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday.
By Marcia Coyle|February 25, 2014
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan (Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi / NLJ)
This premium content is locked for Supreme Court Brief subscribers only.
Subscribe now to enjoy unlimited access to Supreme Court Brief content,
5 free articles* across the ALM Network every 30 days,
Exclusive access to other free ALM publications
And exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications.
*May exclude premium content Already have an account? Sign In Now
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org to learn more.
As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters.
Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss.
Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.