Election Day Just Another Tuesday at Nation's Top Court
Election Day will be a typical oral argument day, with two rather prosaic cases about Medicare reimbursement rates and the Fair Labor Standards Act on the justices' agenda.
November 05, 2024 at 06:45 AM
6 minute read
Welcome to Supreme Court Brief. I'm Jimmy Hoover. I've been covering the Supreme Court for the National Law Journal and ALM since April 2023. In this newsletter, I provide SCOTUS watchers with the latest news and analysis from my vantage point inside the nation's most powerful courtroom.
The justices wrestled with the False Claims Act on Monday, hearing an hour-and-a-half of oral arguments in the case Wisconsin Bell v. U.S. ex rel. Todd Heath. The case involves an AT&T subsidiary's argument that an industry-funded program to provide low-cost internet to schools and libraries is not subject to the False Claims Act. As I explain in my story for the National Law Journal, the court spent most of the hearing debating not whether the telecom company would lose, but how it would lose.
Despite hearing only one case, the Supreme Court kept busy Monday. The morning's orders list announced the addition of two new cases to the October 2024 docket. The first of those promises to settle the "endless game of ping-pong" of Louisiana's congressional boundaries. The state's newest map was drawn as a remedy for a previous one that was struck down under the Voting Rights Act for only including a single majority-Black district. But in creating a second majority-Black district, the state had engaged in an illegal racial gerrymander, a separate court later found. "[T]he State is stuck in an endless game of ping-pong—and the State is the ball, not a player," Louisiana Solicitor General J. Benjamin Aguiñaga wrote in an appeal to the justices.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHungary Tries to Beat Lawsuit from Holocaust Survivors
Justices Hear 'Ancient' Rule About Filing Deadlines, Mob Associate's 25-Year Prison Sentence
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
- 2Where Do All the Prompts Go? Generative AI and the Genesis of a New Emerging Data Paradox
- 3Pa. Jury Returns $4.2M Verdict in Medical Marijuana Program Dispute
- 4Impact of New NYS Workers’ Compensation Work-Related Stress Relief on Discrimination Claims
- 5K&L Gates Secures $10.5M Verdict for Washington Meat Retailer in Lawsuit Over 'Boneless' Chicken Product
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250