Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

We’re anticipating the possibility of opinions this morning, followed by arguments in two supervised-release sentencing cases: United States v. Haymond and Mont v. United States. Predicting the outcome of high court cases based on oral arguments is always risky, but yesterday’s potentially big ruling on public forum doctrine seemed to disappear into a fact-bound morass. “What I can’t do is figure out what the facts are!” Justice Stephen Breyer told the lawyers. Plus: We have a new round of Brett Kavanaugh recusals—this time, cases involving Big Tobacco (and big law firms). Thanks for reading, and contact us anytime at tmauro@alm.com and mcoyle@alm.com.

This premium content is locked for
Supreme Court Brief subscribers only.

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to groupsales@alm.com to learn more.

Tony Mauro

Tony Mauro, based in Washington, covers the U.S. Supreme Court. A lead writer for ALM's Supreme Court Brief, Tony focuses on the court's history and traditions, appellate advocacy and the SCOTUS cases that matter most to business litigators. Contact him at tmauro@alm.com. On Twitter: @Tonymauro

More from this author

Marcia Coyle

Marcia Coyle, based in Washington, covers the U.S. Supreme Court. Contact her at mcoyle@alm.com. On Twitter: @MarciaCoyle

More from this author


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.