Justice Samuel Alito speaking at the Federalist Society 2016 National Lawyers Convention. Credit: Federalist Society
Justices usually do not explain their reasons for recusing—or undoing a recusal, for that matter—but the explanation in this case seems relatively clear.
March 28, 2018 at 04:23 PM
1 minute read
Senior Editor
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A key patent infringement case will be argued April 16 before a full nine-member U.S. Supreme Court after all.
The court announced Wednesday that Justice Samuel Alito Jr., who had recused himself when the court granted review in the case WesternGeco v. ION Geophysical, in January, is “no longer recused.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
