A Pennsylvania Superior Court panel that agreed to reconsider its decision tossing a high-profile $21 million verdict has largely reinstated the result in a new, only slightly revised, opinion.
Last week, a three-judge Superior Court panel agreed to reconsider its April decision in Berg v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, which had tossed the multimillion-dollar award that stemmed from an allegedly faulty car repair. On Tuesday—only three business days after granting reconsideration on May 31—the panel issued its reconsidered opinion, which held to the same result in every major respect.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]