HEALTH CARE LAW
Filial Support Laws • Conflict of Law • Choice of Law • Quantum Meruit • Adult Indigent Child
Melmark v. Schutt, PICS Case No. 17-1373 (Pa. Super. Aug. 21, 2017) Stevens, P. J. (37 pages).
Trial court properly held that elderly parents had no legal obligation to pay for their severely autistic adult son's care in appellant's Pennsylvania facility after New Jersey department of disabilities ceased paying because the services were not rendered to parents personally, they never contracted to pay for the services, New Jersey had the most significant contacts in the controversy and the New Jersey filial support law applied, and parents experienced no personal enrichment so appellant's quantum meruit claim failed. Affirmed.
September 19, 2017 at 09:29 AM
1 minute read
HEALTH CARE LAW
Filial Support Laws • Conflict of Law • Choice of Law • Quantum Meruit • Adult Indigent Child
Melmark v. Schutt, PICS Case No. 17-1373 (Pa. Super. Aug. 21, 2017) Stevens, P. J. (37 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS