A divided Pennsylvania Supreme Court has rejected a Stroudsburg lawyer's argument that he doesn't deserve disbarment for mishandling funds belonging to five of his clients.
June 27, 2017 at 02:03 PM
1 minute read
A divided Pennsylvania Supreme Court has rejected a Stroudsburg lawyer’s argument that he doesn’t deserve disbarment for mishandling funds belonging to five of his clients.
The court ruled 5-2 to adopt a recommendation by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that Peter J. Quigley be disbarred.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
