X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. must face a U.S. Labor Department lawsuit that alleges the company systematically paid female employees less than men, a federal labor appeals panel has ruled, putting a fresh spotlight on pay equity in the financial services industry.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

Mike Scarcella

Mike Scarcella is a senior editor in Washington on ALM Media's regulatory desk. Contact him at mscarcella@alm.com. On Twitter: @MikeScarcella. Mike works on a slate of newsletters: Supreme Court Brief | Higher Law | Compliance Hot Spots | Labor of Law.

More from this author

Law Firms Mentioned

<p dir="ltr"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2311" src="http://www.almcms.com/contrib

    /uploads/sites/398/2017/10/JPMorgan-Chase-Article-201710161309.jpg" alt="" width="620" height="372" /></p> <p dir="ltr">JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. must face a U.S. Labor Department lawsuit that alleges the company systematically paid female employees less than men, a federal labor appeals panel��<u><strong><a href="https://www.oalj.dol.gov/PUBLIC/ARB/DECISIONS/ARB_DECISIONS/OFC/17_063.OFCP_slip_op.pdf" target="_blank">has ruled</a></strong></u>, putting a fresh��<u><strong><a href="http://www.thinkadvisor.com/2016/10/19/gender-pay-gap-in-financial-services-is-one-of-the" target="_blank">spotlight on pay equity</a></strong></u>��in the financial services industry.</p> <p dir="ltr">The decision by a three-judge Administrative Review Board panel, issued on Oct. 5 but not widely reported, marked the second time JPMorgan lost an effort to dismiss the claims. The financial institution, represented by a team from McGuireWoods, earlier failed to convince an administrative law judge to dismiss��<u><strong><a href="https://www.dol.gov/sites/default/files/newsroom/newsreleases/OFCCP20170089.pdf" target="_blank">the Labor Departments allegations</a></strong></u>. The review board this month rejected a petition from the bank that could have shut down the case.</p> <p dir="ltr">The appeals panel said JPMorgan, sued by the Labor Department in January, had not shown any "exceptional circumstances" to force an end to the case. Now, the dispute will return to an administrative judge for a final decision. The complaint seeks, among other things, an injunction barring JPMorgan from discriminating against female employees and it demands lost pay and salary adjustments for the affected class of workers.</p> <p dir="ltr">An order against JPMorgan could jeopardize the continuation of current federal contracts and even bar any future contracts.</p> <p dir="ltr">The case against JPMorgan will move forward concurrently with two other closely watched Labor Department actions against major U.S. companies. The Labor Department��<u><strong><a href="http://www.therecorder.com/id=1202793185583" target="_blank">is investigating</a></strong></u>��Google Inc. for alleged gender-based pay disparities. Separately, Oracle Corp.��<u><strong><a href="http://www.therecorder.com/id=1202777082958" target="_blank">was sued on Jan. 17</a></strong></u>��for alleged discriminatory employment practices, including pay equity violations. Oracle called the Labor Departments complaint "politically motivated."</p> <blockquote class="pullquote"><strong>Read more</strong>:��<a href="http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/12/20/the-push-for-pay-equity/" target="_blank">Special Report: The Push for Pay Equity</a></blockquote> <p dir="ltr">McGuireWoods partner William Doyle Jr. in North Carolina, a lawyer for JPMorgan, was not immediately reached for comment Monday. Doyle, who��<u><strong><a href="https://www.mcguirewoods.com/News/In-the-News/2015/8/Law360-Arrival-Labor-William-Doyle.aspx" target="_blank">joined the firm in 2015</a></strong></u>, formerly served as deputy director of the Labor Departments Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, the enforcement and regulatory arm that conducts compliance review of contractors.</p> <p dir="ltr">A Labor Department spokesperson declined to comment Monday about the Administrative Review Board ruling. A representative from JPMorgan also did not immediatelty comment.</p> <p dir="ltr"><u><strong><a href="https://www.dol.gov/es/node/71113" target="_blank">The Labor Department sued</a></strong></u>��JPMorgan for alleged violations of��<u><strong><a href="https://www.dol.gov/ofccp/regs/compliance/ca_11246.htm" target="_blank">an executive order</a></strong></u>��that forbids federal contractors from discriminating against employees on the basis of race, color, religion, and sex. A review conducted by the Labor Departments contract compliance division said JPMorgan since May 2012 had paid 93 women in four categories���including project management and technology���less than male colleagues in the same roles.</p> <p dir="ltr">"The company continues to fall short of its obligations, compensating a group of female employees significantly less than their male counterparts and thereby failing to eliminate sex discrimination from its compensation process," according to the Labor Departments complaint. Federal regulators said the pay disparity "remains after adjusting for differences in legitimate compensation-determining factors."</p> <p dir="ltr">The Labor Department said it presented its findings to JPMorgan in March 2015 and provided "corrective actions" that the financial institution could employ to resolve the alleged violations. The agency a year later moved to begin the enforcement action after failing to reach voluntary compliance through ���conciliation and persuasion."</p> <p dir="ltr">The complaint against JPMorgan was filed on Jan. 17 by then-Labor Department solicitor M. Patricia Smith, now senior counsel at the National Employment Law Project in Washington. The Trump administration��<u><strong><a href="http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202799274845/Trump-Extends-Kirkland-amp-Ellis-Pipeline-in-Pick-for-Labor-Department-Solicitor" target="_blank">in September nominated</a></strong></u>��Washington-based Kirkland &amp; Ellis litigation partner Kate OScannlain for solicitor, the Labor Departments top lawyer. Her confirmation hearing is not yet scheduled.</p> The Trump administration��<u><strong><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-administration-plans-to-minimize-civil-rights-efforts-in-agencies/2017/05/29/922fc1b2-39a7-11e7-a058-ddbb23c75d82_story.html?utm_term=.e83d096217d1" target="_blank">has suggested making changes</a></strong></u>��to the Labor Departments federal contracts compliance office, merging the division into the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Trump officials��<u><strong><a href="https://www.dol.gov/sites/default/files/CBJ-2018-V2-10.pdf" target="_blank">contend the move would</a></strong></u>��reduce the regulatory burden on employers and give workers "one door" in which to bring workplace discrimination claims. The��<u><strong><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-discrimination-eeoc-trump-20170606-story.html" target="_blank">proposal drew criticism</a></strong></u>��from both labor advocates and the business community. <em>Erin Mulvaney in Washington contributed to this report.</em> <

      >

      Lean Adviser Legal

      Think Lean Daily Message

      "Let s start with a simple but important distinction between goals and outcomes. Goals are what the client wants. Outcomes are what the c..."

      Learn More

       

      ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

      Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

      As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

      Copyright © 2018 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.