The panel found that Matthew Kuhns had standing to bring breach-of-contract claims against Scottrade, but affirmed dismissal of the case on different grounds brought up on appeal.
August 22, 2017 at 09:57 AM
1 minute read
A federal appeals court has found that a plaintiff had standing to sue over a 2013 data breach but couldn’t bring claims based on “bare assertions.”
Monday’s decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed a Missouri federal judge’s finding for St. Louis-based investment firm Scottrade Inc. based on federal jurisdiction.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
