Just six months after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Lanham Act’s ban on disparaging trademarks, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled that barring trademarks that include immoral or scandalous language is an unconstitutional restriction on free speech.

Excellent timing and a focus on the broader implications of the case created the ideal circumstances to have this issue addressed, John Sommer, general counsel of clothing brand Stussy Inc., who argued for the “Fuct” mark in the case, said in an interview with Corporate Counsel following the decision, which was handed down on Dec. 15.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]