The judges are trying to figure out how to handle appeals of PTAB decisions where the board instituted proceedings on a subset of inter partes review claims, instead of all of them as required by recent Supreme Court guidance.
May 04, 2018 at 03:30 PM
1 minute read
Welcome to Skilled in the Art. I’m Law.com IP reporter Scott Graham, and on Tuesday I promised to take a break from the Supreme Court’s SAS Institute decision. I lied! Given the multiple times it’s popped up during this week’s Federal Circuit arguments, I can’t ignore it. But I’ve got plenty of other IP-related news and commentary below. In the meantime, email me your thoughts and feedback and follow me on Twitter.
➤➤ Would you like to receive Skilled in the Art as an email? Sign up here.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaThe current term of office for United States Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen in...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
