Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Shutterstock. Shutterstock.


A small Houston construction law firm has filed a defamation lawsuit against John and Jane Doe, alleging the unknown defendants posted “false and defamatory statements” about the firm on various online websites.

The Cromeens Law Firm, a four-lawyer firm, seeks up to $100,000 in damages from the defendants in The Cromeens Law Firm v. John Doe. The firm alleges the damages are in the form of loss of business reputation, loss of business opportunities and financial damage.

“We are trying to do something about getting irresponsible posts removed,” said Rhonda Allen, a senior associate with the firm. “We just want to determine who [the posts are] from, and whether they are legitimate or not legitimate complaints.”

According to the petition, filed in the 113th District Court in Harris County, Texas, the firm alleges the defendants made false and defamatory statements about it on various online websites with negligence, malice or a reckless disregard for the truth, and also published statements constituting defamation per se.

The petition does not identify any of the websites where the allegedly defamatory statements are published. However, an online search reveals a negative review about the firm on Yelp, and both positive and negative reviews on Google.

In response to the negative reviews on Google, the firm writes that it has no record of the posters being potential, current or former clients, and asks the reviewers to contact the firm. So far, no one has responded to that invitation, Allen said.

The firm filed the suit in an effort to get “irresponsible” reviews removed, and to identify the posters, she said. The lawyers at Cromeens Law Firm are not sure if the critical reviews are posted by disgruntled clients, by competitor firms, or by people who are on the losing end of litigation handled by the firm, she said.

The firm does collections and files mechanic’s liens for contractors and subcontractors.

“[For] most of [the reviews], we can’t connect a case to a person,” Allen said. “That leaves us to believe it’s either someone masquerading as another person or someone with an agenda.”

Copyright Texas Lawyer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2018 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.