Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Whiteford Taylor Preston'

You can use to get even better search results
February 22, 2024 | The Legal Intelligencer

Former Eckert Seamans Trio Returns to Firm, Citing New Leadership

Litigators Ray Middleman, Amy Roy and Shane Valenzi left for Baltimore-based Whiteford, Taylor & Preston in 2022, but Eckert CEO Scott Cessar, who started in the role last May, successfully recruited them back.
4 minute read
January 04, 2024 | Law.com

Federal Judge Allows Defamation Suits to Proceed Against Competitors' False Warnings of 'Serious State Investigation'

"Viewing the allegations in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the plain language of the challenged statement—that Grover is 'under a serious state investigation'—is verifiable, even if confirming the existence of an investigation may require significant legwork. Either an investigation by the state exists, or it does not," U.S. District Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski for the Western District of Virginia said. "The context of the message is important, as it both (1) supports Grover's contention that a reasonable recipient would understand the challenged statement as stating a fact, and (2) reinforces the implication that Grover has engaged in illegal conduct related to charitable gaming."
5 minute read
September 11, 2023 | Delaware Business Court Insider

Automotive Company Officers Accused of Rejecting $875M Sale Settle for $12M

An attorney in the case said said, but it's not uncommon to see such a settlement finalized when the motion has been fully briefed but not argued or resolved.
3 minute read
September 11, 2023 | Delaware Law Weekly

Accused of Rejecting $875M Sale, Automotive Company Officers Settle for $12M

An attorney in the case said it's not uncommon to see such a settlement finalized when the motion has been fully briefed but not argued or resolved.
3 minute read
Schafer v. Kent County Dep't of Planning Serv.
Publication Date: 2023-06-13
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Clark
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: John W. Paradee, Brian V. DeMott, J. Garrett Miller, Baird, Mandalas, Brockstedt, Federico & Cardea, LLC, Dover, DE for petitioners.
For defendant: Daniel A. Griffith, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Richard A. Forsten, Pamela J. Scott, Gary W. Lipkin, Saul, Ewing, Arnstein & Lehr, LLP, Wilmington, DE for respondents.
Case number: K22C-11-014 JJC

Although court lacked statutory authority to hear appeal from administrative decision of county staff since the statute only permitted appeals of decisions by the county's governing board, landowners could challenge the legality of a minor subdivision approval through a writ of certiorari.

Law Journal Press | Digital Book Florida Construction Defect Litigation 2022 Authors: Gary L. Brown View this Book

View more book results for the query "Whiteford Taylor Preston"

May 22, 2023 | The Legal Intelligencer

Lawyers on the Fast Track 2023: Kaan Ekiner

Kaan Ekiner represents companies and individuals in all aspects of corporate control and governance matters, contractual and commercial litigation, post-M&A issues, stockholder class actions and derivative lawsuits, and board of director and stockholder disputes.
1 minute read
April 18, 2023 | The Legal Intelligencer

School Bus Co. Sues Pa. Legislator, Mayor Alleging Civil Rights Violations During State Senate Race

This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
1 minute read
March 03, 2023 | The Legal Intelligencer

Nelson Mullins Launches New Pittsburgh Office With 12 Porter Wright Attorneys

Despite losing nearly half of its lawyers in Pittsburgh, Porter Wright remains committed to the city, according to managing partner Robert Tannous.
4 minute read
In re Virginia True Corp.
Publication Date: 2023-02-23
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Real Estate
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Judge: District Judge Frederic Block
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For the Plaintiffs: Stephen J. Steinlight, Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, New York, New York.
For defendant: For Defendants Applestein and Diatomite Corporation of America: Caroline P. Gately, Venable LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendant Kleinhendler: Michael H. Brady, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP, Richmond, Virginia.
Case number: 20-CV-1614-FB-MMH

Tortious Interference With Contract Claim Dismissed, Can Only Remedy Actual Breach

December 12, 2022 | Law.com

A Recession Will Push More Lawyers Back to the Office: The Morning Minute

The news and analysis you need to start your day.
4 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now

    • Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms

      Brought to you by Ontra

      Download Now

    • The Future of AI in Law

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • The Power of Trust Accounting for Law Firm Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now