Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Tesla'

You can use to get even better search results
April 22, 2024 | Texas Lawyer

Tit for Tat: Attorneys Want Opposing Counsel Penalized

Quinn Emanuel litigator Alex Spiro, representing Elon Musk, argued opposing counsel Mark Bankston of Farrar & Ball violated the discovery order numerous times by posting questions outside the scope of the court order.
4 minute read
Sawnee Electric Membership Corporation v. Georgia Public Service Commission
Publication Date: 2024-04-19
Practice Area: Public Utilities
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Doyle
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Margaret Eckrote, Griffin Ingraham, (Senior Assistant Attorney General), Atlanta, Lee Peifer, James Orr, Benjamin Reed, (Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Christopher Carr, (Attorney General), Atlanta, Jeffrey Stump, (Georgia Department of Law), Atlanta, for appellee; Thomas Reilly, Thomas Bailey, (Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP), Atlanta, Robert Highsmith, Allen Hendrick, Talis Trevino, (Holland & Knight, LLP), Atlanta, for other party; Richard Tisinger, (Tisinger, Vance P.C.), Carrollton, for AM.
Case number: A23A1381

Court affirms Public Service Commission's decision allowing Georgia Power to service Electric Vehicle charging station and rejects challenge based on interpretation of the Electric Service Act

April 11, 2024 | New York Law Journal

D.C. Circuit Upholds Standing in Forced Child Labor Case, but Limits Scope of What Constitutes a 'Venture'

Section 1595(a) of the TVPRA provides a civil remedy against perpetrators and anyone who "knowingly benefits, financially or by receiving anything of value from participation in a venture which that person knew or should have known has engaged in an act in violation." The use of a "knowingly benefits" standard of liability is fairly novel and raises some important questions.
8 minute read
April 09, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Quinn Emanuel's Alex Spiro Facing Sanctions Hearing Over Appearance for Elon Musk in Texas Case

Spiro allegedly appeared on Musk's behalf in defamation case filed in an Austin, Texas court without having filed for pro hac vice status. According to the plaintiff's filing for sanctions, Spiro was combative and "berated opposing counsel" when appearing unannounced for a deposition.
5 minute read
April 09, 2024 | Texas Lawyer

Quinn Emanuel Partner Faces Sanctions Hearing in Elon Musk Defamation Suit

"As damaging as it was, Musk's deposition could have gone even worse but for the obstructionist conduct of the attorney," plaintiffs attorney Mark Bankston claimed.
5 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings and Related Torts in Pennsylvania, Second Edition Authors: George Bochetto, David P. Heim, John A. O’Connell, Robert S. Tintner View this Book

View more book results for the query "Tesla"

April 04, 2024 | Law.com

Everyone Wants a Bite of Apple

Each week, the Law.com Barometer newsletter, powered by the ALM Global Newsroom and Legalweek brings you the trends, disruptions, and shifts our reporters…
6 minute read
April 01, 2024 | Corporate Counsel

Judge Lets EEOC's Race-Bias Suit Against Tesla Proceed, Tossing Aside Claims of 'Factual Vacuity'

Tesla had struck a dismissive tone in its motion to dismiss, saying the suit lacked required specificity. But a judge ruled that the automaker had misstated the standard the EEOC had to meet.
3 minute read
Preister v. Tesla BioHealing, Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-04-01
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Biotechnology
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Ronald G. Poliquin, The Poliquin Firm, Dover, DE for plaintiff.
For defendant: David B. Anthony, Zachary J. Schnapp, Berger McDermott LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case number: 23-00575-CFC

Claims were time-barred under applicable one-year limitations period to the extent they sought to recover unpaid wages, although promissory estoppel claim seeking reimbursement of relocation costs was timely under the general three-year limitations period.

March 27, 2024 | Delaware Business Court Insider

Why Corporate Attorneys Say Delaware Courts Aren't Pushing Away Their Clients

Corporate practitioners say there's been no signs that there will be any significant corporate exodus from Delaware in the near future.
4 minute read
March 27, 2024 | Delaware Law Weekly

Delaware Courts Aren't Pushing Away Their Clients, Corporate Attorneys Say

Corporate practitioners say there's been no signs that there will be any significant corporate exodus from Delaware in the near future.
4 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now

    • Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms

      Brought to you by Ontra

      Download Now