Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox'

You can use to get even better search results
March 15, 2024 | Pro Mid Market

Who Got the Work: Rothwell Figg Attorneys Step in to Defend Paramount Global and Showtime Networks in Patent Infringement Suit

Paramount Global and Showtime Networks have turned to Rothwell Figg Ernst & Manbeck members to fend off a pending patent infringement lawsuit.
2 minute read
January 03, 2024 | New Jersey Law Journal

Teva Defeats Patent Infringement Claims on Endocrine Drug

"This disappointing decision is based on legal and factual errors we are confident will be reversed on appeal," Joseph K. Belanoff, Corcept's CEO, said in a statement.
3 minute read
November 22, 2023 | Legaltech News

Inside Judge Orrick's AI Copyright Order: Is LAION a Copycat?

U.S. District Judge William Orrick truncated plaintiffs' claims in a class action lawsuit against AI content generators. For many across the country fighting AI copyright suits, the order may be an important tool in their arsenal.
5 minute read
October 23, 2023 | Law.com

Judge: Patent Holder's Letter to Alleged Infringing Company Plausibly Established Defendant's Knowledge and Intent

A federal judge in Maine denied a company's motion to dismiss a patent infringement suit filed against it, concluding a letter the patent holder sent the alleged infringing company plausibly established the defendant's specific intent to encourage customer infringement.
4 minute read
September 19, 2023 | Legaltech News

USCO's Decision That AI Prompts Aren't Copyrightable Underscores Tech's 'Black Box' Problem

The U.S. Copyright Office is proving to have a high bar for creativity when considering copyright authorship when artificial intelligence is involved—leading to several AI generations likely ending up in the public domain.
4 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings and Related Torts in Pennsylvania, Second Edition Authors: George Bochetto, David P. Heim, John A. O’Connell, Robert S. Tintner View this Book

View more book results for the query "Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox"

May 19, 2023 | National Law Journal

Sanofi Can Thank Thomas Edison And Samuel Morse For IP Win

Welcome to a special edition of The Supreme Court Brief. The court handed down six decisions Thursday morning, taking another bite out of a large opinion…
6 minute read
May 02, 2023 | Legaltech News

Derivative or Not? IP Attorneys Weigh In on Major AI Art Copyright Class Action

A trio of AI art generators—Stability AI, Deviant Art and Midjourney—are looking to dismiss a class action complaint against them alleging copyright infringement. IP attorneys weigh in on the central arguments of the case and the impact it might have on this evolving issue.
6 minute read
April 10, 2023 | Legaltech News

Monkeys, Holy Spirits, AI—It's All the Same for the U.S. Copyright Office

The U.S. Copyright Office issued a copyright registration to a comic book creator that used a generative AI tool to create visuals, and then revoked it. The agency's action, and subsequent guidance, may have far-reaching consequences for ongoing and future cases around AI IP rights.
5 minute read
March 28, 2023 | Supreme Court Brief

Supreme Court Brief: Fact-Dependent IP Hearing |  ADA 'Tester' Case

IP lawyers were less than thrilled by Monday's U.S. Supreme Court hearing of a case involving complex issues of patent law in the biotech space.
8 minute read
Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Shibuya Hoppman Corp.
Publication Date: 2023-03-28
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Food and Beverage | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Timothy Devlin, Peter A. Mazur, Devlin Law Firm LLC, Wilmington, DE; W. Cook Alciati, Chad E. Ziegler, Gardella Grace, P.A., Washington, DC; Olivia E. Marbutt, Kent & Risley LLC, Alpharetta, GA for plaintiff.
For defendant: John W. Shaw, Karen E. Keller, Nathan R. Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; J.C. Rozendaal, Byron L. Pickard, Michael E. Joffre, Anna G. Phillips, William H. Milliken, Robert E. Niemeier, Deirdre M. Wells, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC, Washington, DC; Jean Paul Y. Nagashima, Frost Brown Todd LLC, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case number: D70174

Court granted judgment as a matter of law as to noninfringement of patents where a plain reading of the patent limitations meant that the accused products were not substantially similar to the described invention and therefore could not infringe under the doctrine of equivalents.

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now

    • Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms

      Brought to you by Ontra

      Download Now