Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation'

You can use to get even better search results
March 14, 2024 | Daily Business Review

Reaching for the Top: A Primer on Florida's Apex Doctrine

At its core, the apex doctrine is a protective doctrine that requires a litigant seeking to depose a high-ranking government or corporate official to show the official has some unique personal knowledge about the issues being litigated and the information cannot be obtained elsewhere.
7 minute read
U.S. ex rel. Vito v. Canzoneri
Publication Date: 2023-06-26
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, U.S. - WDNY
Judge: District Judge Lawrence J. Vilardo
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 20-CV-505

Only Retaliation Claim Survives in FCA Qui Tam Action Over Partially Used Medications

Benoit v. Sikorsy Aircraft
Publication Date: 2022-08-15
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Aerospace
Court: U.S. District Court for Connecticut
Judge: District Judge Nagala
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 3:20-CV-00717

Court Finds Prospective Employee Was Not Hired Due to His Ineligibility, Not His Race

September 15, 2020 | Connecticut Law Tribune

Victory for Sikorsky in Asbestos Case With Issue of First Impression Before Connecticut Supreme Court

The Connecticut Supreme Court has upheld a lower court ruling in a case of first impression dealing with asbestos in the workplace.
4 minute read
Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Maersk Line
Publication Date: 2019-09-24
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Insurance Litigation | Transportation
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Insurance
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge P. Kevin Castel
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 18-cv-121

Dismissal of Insurer's, Shipper's Claims Against Trucking Firm Over Cargo Damage Explained

Malinowski v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
Publication Date: 2019-09-09
Practice Area: Administrative Law | Employment Litigation
Industry: Manufacturing | Transportation
Court: Compensation Review Board
Judge: Judge Morelli
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 6216 CRB-8-17-8

Claimant's Repetitive Work Activities Resulted in Compensable Injury

Candelario v. Bobst North America Inc.
Publication Date: 2019-09-05
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Products Liability
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, U.S. - WDNY
Judge: District Judge Charles Siragusa
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: Joseph A. Regan, Esq., Faraci & Lange LLP, Rochester, NY.
For defendant: For Defendant Bobst North America, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Bobst Champlain, Inc.: Matthew C. Lenahan, Esq., Rupp Baase Pfalzgraf & Cunningham LLC, Rochester, NY. Thomas R. Pender, Esq., Cremer Spina Shaughnessy Jansen & Siegert LLC, Chicago, IL. For Defendant Bobst Lyon, SAS f/k/a SA Martin: Thomas R. Pender, Esq., Cremer Spina Shaughnessy Jansen & Siegert LLC, Chicago, IL. For Third Party Plaintiff Bobst North America, Inc. as Successor in Interest to Bobst Champlain, Inc.: Matthew C. Lenahan, Esq., Rupp Baase Pfalzgraf & Cunningham LLC, Rochester, NY. Thomas R. Pender, Esq., Cremer Spina Shaughnessy Jansen & Siegert LLC, Chicago, IL. For Third Party Defendant Jamestown Container Corporation: No appearance.
Case number: 18-CV-6281

Court Has Jurisdiction Over Box Machine's French Maker, Which Could Foresee Suit in N.Y.

Gentry v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.
Publication Date: 2019-05-20
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Aerospace
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Pratter
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 19-0574

Corporate defendants properly removed action from Pennsylvania state court where defendants were citizens of Delaware and Connecticut and had complete diversity from plaintiff, a citizen of Tennessee, and where all the real and substantial defendants to the action consented to removal. Plaintiff's motion for remand denied; defendants' motion to strike granted.

U.S. ex rel. Kolchinsky v. Moodys Corp.
Publication Date: 2018-03-29
Practice Area: Business Torts | Civil Procedure
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Judge: District Judge William Pauley III
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 12cv1399

FCA Claims Failed For Lack of Materiality As Government Continued to Pay for Services

Cadoret v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
Publication Date: 2018-02-26
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Aerospace | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Connecticut
Judge: District Judge Arterton
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 3:15-cv-1377

Court Denies Employers Summary Judgment Motion over Claim Regarding Interpreter

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now

    • Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms

      Brought to you by Ontra

      Download Now