Court declined to grant leave for an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a preliminary injunction where the court's order only resolved one outstanding issue in the case and thus an interlocutory appeal would not materially advance the litigation.

Corporation's purposeful violation of the express prohibition of setting a retroactive record date for an annual stockholders' meeting warranted invalidating the board election results and reinstating the prior board to hold a new election.

Court declined summary judgment dismissal of fraud claims where allegations of withholding of material information could support equitable tolling and plaintiffs plausibly alleged defendants' motive to fraudulently induce plaintiffs' investment.

Court ordered plaintiffs to produce unredacted versions of their fee agreements with proposed class counsel where plaintiffs admitted they had funding litigation agreements and the fee agreements were necessary for the court to evaluate whether counsel could adequately represent the class or had separate duties to the litigation funders, whose interests could diverge from the class.

Court upheld expert determination issued under parties' contractual dispute resolution clause where record undermined objector's claim that expert overlooked or improperly relied on evidence.

Court found no breach of an exclusivity provision in a letter of intent where the provision merely prohibited soliciting proposals for a sale of the subject business, rather than communications about a potential transaction, and announcing consideration of strategic alternatives did not rise to the level of a firm solicitation.

Governance provisions transferring authority from board to controlling investors was facially invalid where such provisions had not been incorporated into the corporate charter, as charters could not incorporate private agreements by reference without rendering them non-public and preventing stockholders from amending the charter.