0 results for 'Prudential'
Malpractice Suit Alleges Law Firm Accepted Bonuses for Steering Client Into Arbitration
Judges Garry Rothstadt, Jessica Mayer and Arnold Natali Jr. said dismissing the case was "too drastic" a penalty for discovery violations and that lesser penalties were available.Discovery Strategy in Sanctions Enforcement Cases
In anticipation of the need to advise clients on sanctions compliance, the possibility of enforcement actions, and during criminal investigations, this article discusses strategies for discovery litigation in the types of cases the Department of Justice (DOJ) has forecast.Malpractice Claims Against Plaintiff Counsel in Prudential Litigation Rightly Dismissed, Court Rules
The malpractice suit alleged that lawyers for plaintiffs in the underlying case against Prudential made claims against the settlement proceeds for costs and expenses that were actually payments to other lawyers to perform legal work on the case.Insurance Bad Faith, Peer Review to Highlight Supreme Court Session
With the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's argument session scheduled to begin Tuesday, the justices are set to consider a wide range of high-profile topics, from the requirement for proving an insurance carrier acted in bad faith to the discoverability of peer review documents.Insurance Bad Faith, Peer Review to Highlight Supreme Court Session
With the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's argument session scheduled to begin Tuesday, the justices are set to consider a wide range of high-profile topics, from the requirement for proving an insurance carrier acted in bad faith to the discoverability of peer review documents.View more book results for the query "Prudential"
The New, Data-Driven World of Firm E-Discovery Operations
Three law firms offer insight on their e-discovery operations strategies: what works, what doesn't, and what issues should be on firms' minds as they look towards the future.Second Circuit Clarifies Scope of Rule 30(b)(6) Testimony
In their Second Circuit Review, Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp, analyze a case in which the court clarified the circumstances and manner in which a corporate party can supplement its prior deposition testimony through additional testimony or affidavits under Rule 30(b)(6) of the FRCP—here, testimony from a different witness that the opposing party claimed contradicted the first individual designated by the corporation to provide testimony on its behalf.Proportionality: The (Not So) New Kid on the Block
Samantha V. Ettari of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel writes: Proportionality—described only two years ago by one federal judge as "an all-too-often ignored discovery principle"—will soon be one of the primary considerations in defining the scope of discovery.Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms
Brought to you by Ontra
Download Now