0 results for 'Prickett, Jones'
Tesla Shareholders Move to Consolidate Cases Over Musk's Focus on X, AI
If the motion is granted, the court would go from juggling seven cases against Tesla and Elon Musk to five.Attorneys No Longer Need to Wait for Chancery Order to File Confidentially
The change to Rule 5.1 is included in the second tranche of amendments to Chancery rules Chancellor Kathaleen St. J. McCormick has approved as part of a project revising the court's rules to realign with Delaware case law and statutes as well as federal rules.Court denied motion to compel discovery to the extent that discovery requests sought documents irrelevant to the case or communications protected by attorney-client privilege.
Court declined to dismiss non-exculpated fiduciary claims where defendants had a clear conflict of interest between continuing to operate the company or sell it and receive a valuable termination payment.
'The Preposterous Has Become Reality': Chancery Filings Continue to Target Musk, Tesla Board
Complaints in Delaware court allege that Elon Musk sought to take AI-related projects elsewhere if he could not maintain a 25% equity stake in the electric car manufacturer.View more book results for the query "Prickett, Jones "
Musk's Focus on X Has Come at Tesla's Expense, Shareholder Lawsuit Claims
"Neither Musk's past success nor his importance to Tesla's business gives him carte blanche to treat his fiduciary duties to Tesla as optional," the complaint states.Shareholder Lawsuit Claims Musk's Focus on X Has Come at Tesla's Expense
"Neither Musk's past success nor his importance to Tesla's business gives him carte blanche to treat his fiduciary duties to Tesla as optional," the complaint states.No action clause in D&O insurance policy was enforceable and precluded insured from filing legal action against the insurer until the insured's financial obligations were fixed in an underlying litigation.
Chancery court erroneously applied business judgment rule to review transaction where controlling stockholder stood on both sides and received a non-ratable benefit where not all members of the company's separation committee were independent from the controller.
Delaware Supreme Court Stresses Committee Independence In Match Group Decision
The Supreme Court said entire fairness is the standard of review in any controller-involved transaction, but business judgment can be applied when both an independent committee and a shareholder vote approve the deal.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
2025 State Legislative Sessions
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Retention & Online Reputation for Law Firms: 2025 Guide
Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.
Download Now
Europe's Escalating Regulatory Framework: Mapping Efforts to Mitigate Supply Chain Risks
Brought to you by LRN
Download Now
5 Proven Steps to Accelerate Business Growth in a Crowded Legal Market
Brought to you by AllRize
Download Now