Search Results

0 results for 'Price Law'

You can use to get even better search results
Victory Media Group, LLC v. Georgia Department of Transportation
Publication Date: 2024-05-14
Practice Area: Constitutional Law
Industry: Advertising
Court: Georgia Supreme Court
Judge: Presiding Justice Peterson
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Edward Adam Webb, (Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Logan B. Winkles, Amy Lynne Patterson, Christopher M. Carr, (Department of Law), Atlanta, Denise E. Weiner, Pearson Kern Cunningham, (Hall, Booth, Smith P.C.), Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: S24C0144

Court denies petition for certiorari where applicant had challenged the constitutionality of Georgia's Advertising Control Act, citing lack of direct harm

Culverson v. The State
Publication Date: 2024-05-09
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Judge Hodges
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Andrew Thomas, Valdosta, for appellant.
For defendant: Joseph Mulholland, Christopher Quinn, Banks Smith, (South Georgia Judicial Circuit District Attorney’s Office), Bainbridge, for appellee.
Case number: A24A0543

Court affirms convictions for invasion of privacy and sexual battery over defendant's challenges to sufficiency of evidence, juror's post-evidence review of an exhibit, and claims of cumulative error

Premier Petroleum, Inc. v. Heer, Inc. et al.
Publication Date: 2024-04-26
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Distribution and Wholesale | Energy
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Doyle
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Justyn Alioto, (Mills & Hoopes, LLC), Atlanta, John McGoldrick, (Mills & Hoopes, LLC), Macon, Timothy Walls, (Mills & Hoopes, LLC), Lawrenceville, for appellant.
For defendant: Michael Cooper, Kenneth Barton, Kareem Kashlan, (Cooper, Barton & Cooper, LLP), Macon, for appellee.
Case number: A23A1432

Court affirms ruling that a gasoline supply contract was void and unenforceable due to procedural and substantive unconscionability of its terms, which unduly favored the supplier

April 24, 2024 | The American Lawyer

Kirkland v Latham: Blackstone Swings Into Hipgnosis Deal to Rival Apollo Bid

The deal pits the world's largest private equity firms and their Big Law legal advisers against one another.
2 minute read
April 24, 2024 | Delaware Business Court Insider

Chancery Urged to Block Tesla 'Run From Jurisdiction' in Elon Musk Pay Case

Tesla has filed a proxy indicating it would be seeking shareholder votes on a relocation to Texas and whether Musk should receive the 2018 compensation plan that had been struck down by the Court of Chancery.
3 minute read
April 24, 2024 | National Law Journal

DOT Requires Airlines to Disclose Junk Fees, Provide Prompt Refunds

"Airlines should compete with one another to secure passengers' business—not to see who can charge the most in surprise fees," U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said.
3 minute read
April 24, 2024 | The American Lawyer

Through Merger Talks, Troutman and Locke Lord Seek Market-Leading Position in Several Practices

The combined firm would have more than 90 lawyers in energy practices, 120 lawyers in life sciences practices, and 100 in real estate, according to an analysis of the firms' head count in these practices.
5 minute read
April 24, 2024 | Law.com

Critical Mass With Law.com's Amanda Bronstad: Mixed Results in J&J's First Post-Bankruptcy Talc Verdicts, Antitrust Class Actions Surge Over Sugar

The first talcum powder verdicts involving Johnson & Johnson since the failed bankruptcies of its subsidiary last year both ended on April 19—but with mixed results.
7 minute read
April 24, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Has the Seventh Circuit Opened the Door for Distressed Investors Through Limiting the Risk of Failed LBOs or Other Stock Sales?

In March, the Seventh Circuit held that the same safe harbor provisions in the Bankruptcy Code may also extend to leveraged acquisitions structured as a purchase of privately held stock.
10 minute read
April 24, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Supreme Court Confirms 'Pure Omissions' Cannot Support Securities Fraud Liability

In a significant decision regarding the scope of the federal securities laws' anti-fraud provisions, the U.S. Supreme Court held that "pure omissions" are inactionable under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and its enabling rule, SEC Rule 10b-5.
9 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now

    • Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms

      Brought to you by Ontra

      Download Now