Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
1,385 results for 'Potter Anderson & Corroon' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
August 5, 2022 | Delaware Business Court Insider
Musk's counterclaims show his attempts to gauge the number of spam accounts on the platform and the value of active accounts and criticizes Twitter's method to detect bots.
3 minute read
August 5, 2022 | Delaware Law Weekly
Musk's counterclaims show his attempts to gauge the number of spam accounts on the platform and the value of active accounts and criticizes Twitter's method to detect bots.
3 minute read
August 5, 2022 | Law.com
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
4 minute read
August 4, 2022 | The American Lawyer
Twitter is subpoenaing Davis Polk, which advised banks in the deal's debt financing. Meanwhile, both sides have enlisted conflict counsel firms.
6 minute read
August 4, 2022 | The Recorder
Twitter is subpoenaing Davis Polk, which advised banks in the deal's debt financing. Meanwhile, both sides have enlisted conflict counsel firms.
6 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Gary L. Brown
View this BookView more book results for the query "Potter Anderson & Corroon"
August 4, 2022 | Delaware Business Court Insider
Twitter is subpoenaing Davis Polk, which advised banks in the deal's debt financing. Meanwhile, both sides have enlisted conflict counsel firms.
6 minute read
August 3, 2022 | Delaware Business Court Insider
The Delaware legislature has passed a bill to amend Section 102(b)(7) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware to alter the scope of monetary liability for officers of Delaware corporations. Specifically, the amendments extend the opportunity for Delaware corporations to exculpate their officers, in addition to their directors, for monetary liability for certain breaches of fiduciary duty.
10 minute read
Publication Date: 2022-08-02
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Real Estate
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Traynor
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael Hanrahan, Ronald A. Brown, Jr., Stephen D. Dargitz, J. Clayton Athey, Marcus E. Montejo, Samuel L. Closic, Prickett Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Carl L. Stine, Adam J. Blander, Antoinette Adesanya, Wolf Popper LLP, New York, NY; Brian D. Long, Long Law, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Frank P. DiPrima, Law Office of Frank DiPrima, P.A., Morristown, NJ for appellants.
for defendant: Kevin G. Abrams, John M. Seaman, Matthew L. Miller, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; John A. Neuwirth, Evert J. Christensen, Jr., Seth Goodchild, Matthew S. Connors, Nicole E. Prunetti, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, NY; Peter J. Walsh, Jr., Berton W. Ashman, Jr., and Jaclyn C. Levy, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Peter E. Kazanoff, Michael J. Garvey, Sara A. Ricciardi, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, NY; Raymond J. Dicamillo, Susan M. Hannigan, Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE; Brian T. Frawley, Y. Carson Zhou, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, NY; David J. Teklits, Thomas P. Will, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellees.
Case Number: D69905
Dividing merger transaction into substantial pre-closing dividend and meager "per share merger consideration" did not frustrate stockholders' appraisal rights since dividend legally constituted merger consideration.
July 28, 2022 | Delaware Business Court Insider
The Musk team claimed in a letter sent Tuesday that Twitter is intentionally holding up discovery in an effort to give Musk as little time as possible to analyze the data he's requested. The trial in Delaware Chancery Court could start on Oct. 10 or 17.
4 minute read
Publication Date: 2022-07-26
Practice Area: Copyrights
Industry: E-Commerce | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ifedoo Enigwe, Philadelphia, PA, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Brandon Ryan Harper, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Craig E. Pinkus, Philip Zimmerly, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP, Indianapolis, IN; Alan Richard Silverstein, Connolly Gallagher LLP, Wilmington, DE; Nicholas D. Mozal, Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: D69896
Although plaintiff alleged plausible copyright infringement claim pursuant to his original agreement with his publisher, the applicability of a later settlement between plaintiff and publisher had to be resolved by an Indiana court pursuant to the settlement's forum selection clause.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
