0 results for 'Pearson'
NFL, Raiders Win 9th Circuit Dismissal of Oakland Antitrust Suit Over Vegas Relocation
The Ninth Circuit majority ruled that Oakland had alleged an antitrust injury but did not allege with sufficient certainty that the Raiders would have stayed in Oakland under more competitive circumstances.Merchants Claim Visa, Mastercard Are Fixing Prices On Fees For Square Credit Card Payments
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.Judge Sacks Oakland's Antitrust Lawsuit Against the Raiders, NFL
U.S. Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero on Thursday dismissed the city's antitrust claims related to the team's relocation to Las Vegas, declining to endorse what he called Oakland's "unorthodox theory of antitrust injury."View more book results for the query "Pearson"
With Raiders Headed to Vegas, Judge Questions Oakland's Antitrust Claims Against Team, NFL
"There's no indication about what that market would look like and under that market whether Oakland would have gotten a team," said U.S. Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero at a hearing in the case Friday.Antitrust Lawsuits Target Electronic Distribution of College Textbooks
The New Jersey lawsuit targets a distribution model that replaces physical textbooks with course materials that are exclusively sold by campus bookstores in electronic format .Antitrust Lawsuits Filed in Del. and Other States Over Electronic Distribution of College Textbooks
The New Jersey lawsuit targets a distribution model that replaces physical textbooks with course materials that are exclusively sold by campus bookstores in electronic format .Judge Leaves Tiny Gap for Oakland's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Raiders Run to Vegas
A federal judge overseeing the City of Oakland's lawsuit against the National Football League and the Raiders over the team's impending move to Las Vegas has left just a sliver of running room for the city's antitrust claims.Oakland Throws a Block at DOJ Bid to Weigh in on Antitrust Claims Over Raiders Move
Lawyers with DOJ's Antitrust Division contend that lost tax revenues don't constitute an injury to “business or property” recoverable under federal antitrust law and to find otherwise "could lead to anticompetitive effects from over-deterrence."Download Now
Download Now
Download Now
Download Now