Court enforced contractual specific remedy provision where breaching party offered no persuasive argument for disregarding the clause and ordered the breaching party to perform at the value the warrant to purchase shares had at the time of its breach.

Expert opinion on liability was not unreliable where it detailed how data for comparison was selected, as limited qualitative analysis did not automatically render the opinion unreliable.

Court declined to enforce arbitration provision against nonsignatory plaintiffs where their complaint did not seek to enforce the terms of the contract containing the arbitration clause.

Court determined that former officer was obligated to repay advanced legal expenses where he was ultimately convicted on a single racketeering conspiracy charge that included the same alleged predicate racketeering activities as the first indictment, undermining claims of partial success in the criminal prosecution.

Officer was obligated to reimburse corporation for advancement costs issued in connection with officer's criminal prosecution for actions taken in the course of his duties when that prosecution culminated in his conviction, precluding him from asserting good faith entitlement to indemnification under the Delaware General Corporation Law.