Search Results

0 results for 'Morris Law Group'

You can use to get even better search results
Ferguson et al. v. Bowers et al.
Publication Date: 2024-04-29
Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
Industry: Health Care
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Doyle
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Laura Speed, Michelle King, (Speed & King, LLC), Atlanta, Michael Terry, Matthew Sellers, (Bondurant Mixson & Elmore), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: John Hall, Beth Kanik, (Hall, Booth, Smith, & Slover, P.C.), Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: A23A1715

Court affirms summary judgment in favor of physicians in a medical malpractice action stemming from the discharge of a patient with mental disorders who drowned after being released

April 18, 2024 | Law.com

NY Cannabis Marketing Rulings / Rescheduling Effects / Honigman's Work on Trademark Suit / Goodbye

A New York judge sent the Empire State cannabis industry into a temporary tizzy when he invalidated large sections of the state's cannabis regulations. One day later, Justice Kevin Bryant amended his ruling to apply only to third-party cannabis marketing restrictions.
9 minute read
April 18, 2024 | Daily Report Online

2024 Southeastern Legal Awards Honorees Announced

The Daily Report and Law.com are pleased to announce its 2024 winners and finalists for the second annual Southeastern Legal Awards. Previously known…
4 minute read
Gotfryd v. City of Newburgh
Publication Date: 2024-04-18
Practice Area: Civil Rights | Employment Compliance | Employment Litigation
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Nelson S. Román
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 21 Civ. 4009

City Planner's Speech Was Pursuant to Official Duties, Not Protected by First Amendment

April 17, 2024 | The American Lawyer

Gaining Steam in Los Angeles, Shook Hires Litigation Group From Carlton Fields

Four litigation partners in Los Angeles, Atlanta and South Florida have joined Shook, Hardy & Bacon.
3 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book New Jersey Medical Malpractice Law 2024 Authors: Jonathan H. Lomurro, Gary L. Riveles, Abbott S. Brown View this Book

View more book results for the query "Morris Law Group"

April 17, 2024 | New Jersey Law Journal

Town to Pay $5.5M to Developer After Mayor Blocks Corporate Headquarters Project

"At the outset of the trial, the town announced that there would be no settlement, calling it a 'no pay' case," said Joseph Fiorenzo, attorney for The Silverman Group.
4 minute read
April 17, 2024 | The Legal Intelligencer

Phila. Associate Talent Market Cools, as Local Firms Refine Retention Strategies

"They could be happier financially or happier culturally, but there are less disgruntled attorneys at their current firms looking to get out," said Alevistar Legal Search founder Brian Levinson.
6 minute read
April 16, 2024 | The Legal Intelligencer

Give Contract Amendments Their Own Integration-Plus Clauses

The incorporation of an integration clause into an amendment merely preserves the original integration clause and precludes evidence of oral or written representations that occurred prior to or contemporaneous with the execution of the original contract. The mere incorporation of the original integration clause into an amendment does not cover the time period between the execution of the original contract and the amendment.
6 minute read
In re Match Group, Inc. Derivative Litig.
Publication Date: 2024-04-15
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: E-Commerce | Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Seitz
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Michael Hanrahan, J. Clayton Athey, Corinne Elise Amato, Kevin H. Davenport, Stacey A. Greenspan, Jason W. Rigby, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Lee D. Rudy, Eric L. Zagar, J. Daniel Albert, Maria T. Starling, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, Radnor, PA; Robert D. Klausner, Klausner, Kaufman, Jensen & Levinson, Plantation, FL for appellants.
For defendant: William M. Lafferty, John P. DiTomo, Elizabeth A. Mullin, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Theodore N. Mirvis, Jonathan M. Moses, Ryan A. McLeod, Alexandra P. Sadinsky, Canem Ozyildirim, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York, NY; Blake Rohrbacher, Matthew W. Murphy, Sandy Xu, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Maeve O’Connor, Susan R. Gittes, Amy C. Zimmerman, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York, NY; David E. Ross, Adam D. Gold, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Joshua G. Hamilton, Meryn C.N. Grant, Latham & Watkins LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Blair Connelly, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, NY; Michele D. Johnson, Latham & Watkins LLP, Costa Mesa, CA for appellees.
Case number: 368, 2022

Chancery court erroneously applied business judgment rule to review transaction where controlling stockholder stood on both sides and received a non-ratable benefit where not all members of the company's separation committee were independent from the controller.

April 11, 2024 | Texas Lawyer

Newsmakers: J.D. Silva & Associates Announces New Firm Managing Partner Armando Córdova

Tracking ins and the outs of Texas Lawyers.
7 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now

    • Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms

      Brought to you by Ontra

      Download Now