0 results for 'Miller & Law P.C.'
Bledsoe v. Ctr. for Human Reprod.
Publication Date: 2024-04-24 Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department Judge: Justice Martin Shulman Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellants: Matthew Gaier and John D. Cagney of counsel, Kramer, Dillof, Livingston & Moore, New York. For defendant: For Respondents: Daniel S. Ratner of counsel, Heidell, Pittoni, Murphy & Bach, LLP, New York. Case number: 800212/11
Issue of Fact Exists as to Potential Impact of Cryopreservation Process on Embryos
A Safe Bet? Lateral Hiring and Gambling on a Firm's Future
Lateral hiring is risky business. The Global Lawyer asks, is the gamble worth it?
Appellate Division, First Department: April 22, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-04-22 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appeals & Motions List released on:April 18, 2024
Golden Pantry Food Stores, Inc. v. Bradley
Publication Date: 2024-04-22 Practice Area: Civil Procedure |
Premises Liability
Industry: Retail
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals Judge: Chief Judge Mercier Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jackson Dial, (Weinberg Wheeler Hudgins Gunn & Dial LLC), Atlanta, Austin Atkinson, (Hall Booth Smith, P.C.), Atlanta, for appellant. For defendant: ShaMiracle Rankin, (CP Law Group, LLC), Atlanta, Christopher Graddock, Keenan Nix, (Morgan & Morgan Atlanta, PLLC), Atlanta, Darren Summerville, Meghan Hatfield Yanacek, (The Summerville Firm), Atlanta, Meredith Kincaid, (Cross Kincaid), Decatur, for appellee. Case number: A23A1597
Court vacates spoliation sanctions against retail food store in a pair of premises liability cases and remands for reconsideration of plaintiff's actions under an alternate standard
Appellate Division, Second Department: April 19, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-04-19 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Handdown List released on:April 17, 2024
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
New Jersey Real Estate Brokerage Law 2024
Authors: Barry S. Goodman
View this Book
View more book results for the query "Miller & Law P.C."
Appellate Division, Second Department: April 19, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-04-19 Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity |
Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion List & Order on Application Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Motion List & Order on Application released on:April 17, 2024
NY Cannabis Marketing Rulings / Rescheduling Effects / Honigman's Work on Trademark Suit / Goodbye
A New York judge sent the Empire State cannabis industry into a temporary tizzy when he invalidated large sections of the state's cannabis regulations. One day later, Justice Kevin Bryant amended his ruling to apply only to third-party cannabis marketing restrictions.
Appellate Division, First Department: April 18, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-04-18 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appeals & Motions List released on:April 16, 2024
1163 Manor Realty LLC v. La Catrina Mexican Restaurant Corp.
Publication Date: 2024-04-18 Practice Area: Landlord Tenant Law
Industry:
Court: Civil Court, Bronx Judge: Judge Betty Lugo Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Petitioner by: Jonathan E. Neuman, Esq., Law Offices of Jonathan E. Neuman, Esq. For defendant: For Respondents by: Masood Syed, Esq., Law Offices of Masood Syed, P.C. Case number: LT-346518-23/BX
Tenants Allowed to Amend Answer to Assert Legal Impossibility Claim
Judge Sides With Sanofi, Dismissing Patient's Claims Against Cancer Medication Taxotere
The plaintiff sought to file an amended complaint, which would replace her short form complaint that defines "Permanent Chemotherapy Induced Alopecia," using identical language in which the multidistrict litigation court previously rejected. Chief U.S. District Judge Michael F. Urbanski rejected the plaintiff's request and agreed with Sanofi as to each of the plaintiff's claims.TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Carolyn Burbrink, Uber Director of Volume Mobility Safety and Insurance Litigation 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Andy Goldberg, Laner Muchin Managing Partner 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at Legalweek 2024: Priori CEO and Co-Founder Basha Rubin; Shook, Hardy & Bacon Partner Patrick Oot 1 minute read
Resources
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms
Brought to you by Ontra
Download Now