0 results for 'Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP'
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Novartis Pharma AG
Publication Date: 2024-03-26 Practice Area: Antitrust |
Business Torts
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Judge: Circuit Judge Barrington D. Parker Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Joshua Halpern, Elizabeth S. Weiswasser, Eric S. Hochstadt, & Anish R. Desai, on the brief, Adam Banks, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, NY & Washington, D.C. For defendant: For Defendants-Appellees Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis Technology LLC, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Ian Simmons, Lisa Pensabene, Stephen J. McIntyre, & Melissa C. Cassel, on the brief, William Jay, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, D.C., New York, NY, Los Angeles, CA & San Francisco, CA.
Benjamin T. Horton & Julianne M. Hartzell, on the brief, Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee Vetter Pharma International GmbH.
Anisha S. Dasgupta & Joel Marcus, on the brief, Matthew M. Hoffman, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C., and Jonathan S. Kanter, Daniel E. Haar, Nickolai G. Levin, & Andrew N. DeLaney, on the brief, United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Washington, D.C., Amici Curiae in Support of Neither Party. Case number: 22-0427-cv
Anti-VEGF Medications in Vials, Pre-Filled Syringes Compete in Different Product Markets
Beyond Language: How Multimodal AI Sees the Bigger Picture
What distinguishes between the ChatGPT versus multimodal varieties of artificial intelligence? How may such multimodal systems further extend machine learning's capacities? And by what means might novel implementations leveraging multiple modalities secure patent rights?
IP Considerations of Biden's Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence
By addressing artificial intelligence at the federal level, the executive order underscores the importance of AI while acknowledging the need for the United States manage its potential dangers in order to become global leaders in the AI field.
Strategic Management of AI in Corporate Environments: Navigating IP and Legal Risks
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technology, the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot has revolutionized the way companies operate. These AI systems promise to significantly enhance the efficiency and productivity of employees, especially in fields like software development and content generation
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Rules 2024
Authors:
View this Book
View more book results for the query "Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP"
USCO's Decision That AI Prompts Aren't Copyrightable Underscores Tech's 'Black Box' Problem
The U.S. Copyright Office is proving to have a high bar for creativity when considering copyright authorship when artificial intelligence is involved—leading to several AI generations likely ending up in the public domain.
Bitcoin NFTs: Making the Case to Be Sole Digital Asset Protocol
NFTs are unique identifiers stored on a blockchain which represent ownership of a particular asset in the digital or physical world. They are typically created and transferred on a smart contract platform such as Ethereum or Solana. However, NFTs have recently come to the Bitcoin blockchain, which is an exciting development for several reasons.
How to Diversify the Pool of Inventors - and Improve Innovation
Efforts to diversify the inventive population will not only foster innovation across a wide range of businesses and industries but will also help greatly expand the pool of inventors across racial, gender and ethnic categories, and the country as a whole will realize numerous benefits.
BearBox LLC v. Lancium LLC
Publication Date: 2023-03-21 Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: E-Commerce |
Electronics |
Software
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware Judge: District Judge Williams Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Benjamin T. Horton, John R. Labbe, Raymond R. Ricordati III, Chelsea M. Murray, Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP, Chicago, IL for plaintiffs. For defendant: Chad. S.C. Stover, Mark C. Nelson, Darrick J. Hooker, Adam M. Kaufmann, Dana Amato Sarros, David M. Lisch, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants. Case number: 21-534-GBW
Court declined to correct inventorship of patent where plaintiffs could not show that they had conceived of various claims in the patent and had not communicated other claims to defendants before defendants had independently conceived of those claims and reduced them to practice.
TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Legal Speak at Legalweek 2024: Priori CEO and Co-Founder Basha Rubin; Shook, Hardy & Bacon Partner Patrick Oot 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at Legalweek 2024: Relativity's Director of AI Transformation and Law Firm Strategy Cristin Traylor; Zeem Solutions GC and Chief Privacy Officer John Meyer 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at Legalweek 2024: Cimplifi GC Marla Crawford and Everlaw VP of Marketing Joshua Schnoll 1 minute read
Resources
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms
Brought to you by Ontra
Download Now