Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Hennessy Industries, Inc.'

You can use to get even better search results
AXA XL Ins. Co. UK Ltd. v. Exel Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-03-15
Practice Area: Damages | Transportation
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for New Jersey
Judge: District Judge Martini
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 2:23-cv-21874 (WJM)

Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's subrogation action.

September 07, 2023 | Connecticut Law Tribune

Magistrate Allows RICO Claims as PFAS Class Action Proceeds

"I believe this is the first example in a PFAS contamination situation where RICO claims have been allowed to moved forward," Sloss said. "We alleged that they engaged in a series of transactions to ensure unchecked dumping of contaminated byproduct or materials ... and allowing the RICO claims to go through appropriately will make the defendants explain why they shouldn't be held liable for a pattern of racketeering activity."
5 minute read
In re: Asbestos Litig.
Publication Date: 2023-06-06
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Jones
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Michael C. Dalton, Dalton & Associates, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Michael Collins Smith, Balick & Balick, LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
For defendant: Brian D. Tome, Reilly, McDevitt & Henrich, P.C., Wilmington, DE, attorney for defendant.
Case number: N19C-01-100 ASB

Manufacturer of machinery expressly designed to work on asbestos-containing products could have liability in asbestos litigation since use of the product would inevitably create hazardous asbestos dust, imposing a duty to warn upon the manufacturer.

IKB Intl. SA v. Morgan Stanley
Publication Date: 2023-03-10
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Supreme Court, New York
Judge: Justice Melissa A. Crane
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 653964/2012

Issue of Fact Exists as to Reliance on Offering Documents' Alleged Misrepresentations

Wu v. Uber Technologies Inc.
Publication Date: 2022-12-23
Practice Area: Dispute Resolution
Industry: Automotive | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Supreme Court, Bronx
Judge: Justice Veronica G. Hummel
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 33964/2020E

Uber's Demand for Arbitration Granted in Action Brought by Injured Passenger

October 19, 2022 | Law.com

Hiring Slump Favors Law Firms With Dry Powder: The Morning Minute

The news and analysis you need to start your day.
5 minute read
Danskammer Energy LLC v. NYS Dept. of Envtl. Conservation
Publication Date: 2022-06-28
Practice Area: Environmental Law
Industry: Energy
Court: Supreme Court, Orange
Judge: Justice Robert Onofry
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Counsel for Petitioner-Plaintiff: Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Albany, New York. Steven C. Russo, New York, New York. Brenda Colella, Barclay Damon Tower, Syracuse, New York.
For defendant: For the State Respondents: Joshua Michael Tallent, Assistant Attorney General, the Capitol, Albany, New York. Attorneys for Proposed Amicus Curiae Independent Power Producers of New York, Inc: Read And Laniado, LLP, Albany, New York. Attorneys for proposed Amicus Curiae New York State AFL-CIO, New York State Building and Construction Trades Council, and Hudson Valley Building and Construction Trades Council: Colleran, O'Hara & Mills LLP, Woodbury, New York. Attorneys for proposed Amicus Curiae Astoria Gas Turbine Power LLC: Barclay Damon LLP, Albany, New York. Attorneys for proposed Amicus Curiae Mitsubishi Power: Holland & Knight LLP, New York, New York. Attorney for Proposed Amicus Curiae The Peak Coalition: New York Lawyers for the Public Interest, New York, New York. Attorneys for Proposed Amicus Curiae Sierra Club and Orange RAPP: Earth Justice, New York, New York.
Case number: EF008396-2021

DEC Has Authority Under the CLCPA to Deny Permit Application

March 29, 2022 | Delaware Law Weekly

Delaware Supreme Court Revives Asbestos Case, Finding Enough Evidence to Hurdle Defense Summary Judgment Motion

The 2006 case Stigliano v. Westinghouse still sets the standard, but the Supreme Court rejected the trial court's finding that the burden of proof hadn't been met.
3 minute read
March 29, 2022 | Delaware Business Court Insider

Widow Provided Enough Evidence to Defeat Summary Judgment Motion, Delaware Supreme Court Says, Reviving Asbestos Case

The 2006 case Stigliano v. Westinghouse still sets the standard, but the Supreme Court rejected the trial court's finding that the burden of proof hadn't been met.
3 minute read
In the Matter of Appellate Advocates v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Publication Date: 2022-03-04
Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Third Department
Judge: Unsigned Egan Jr., J.P. (vouched in), Lynch, Aarons, Pritzker and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 531737

In the Matter of Appellate Advocates v. New York

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now

    • Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms

      Brought to you by Ontra

      Download Now