Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Hahn Hessen'

You can use to get even better search results
Broockmann v. The Bank of Greene County
Publication Date: 2023-11-06
Practice Area: Banking and Finance Laws
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, U.S. - NDNY
Judge: District Judge Anne M. Nardacci
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff: Jeffrey D. Kaliel, Esq., of counsel, Kalielgold PLLC, Washington, D.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff: Sophia G. Gold, Esq., of counsel, Kalielgold PLLC, Washington, D.C.
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendant: Lukas Sosnicki, Esq., Thompson Coburn Hahn & Hessen LLP, Los Angeles, CA. Attorneys for Defendant: Matthew B. Nevola, Esq, of counsel, Thompson Coburn Hahn & Hessen LLP, New York, NY.
Case number: 1:22-CV-00390

Court Approves $1.21 Million Settlement With Bank Over Overdraft Fee Policies

September 14, 2023 | Texas Lawyer

Thompson Coburn Seeking Transactional Lawyers As Dallas Office Grows

Chris Hohn, a Thompson Coburn partner in St. Louis who is on the management and executive committees, will become chair in August 2024.
3 minute read
September 14, 2023 | The American Lawyer

In Transition to Next-Gen Leaders, Thompson Coburn Taps Litigator as New Chair

Chris Hohn, a Thompson Coburn partner in St. Louis who is on the management and executive committees, will become chair in August 2024.
3 minute read
Kent v. PoolTogether Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-06-13
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
Judge: District Judge Frederic Block
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For the Plaintiff: Charles Gerstein, Gerstein Harrow LLP, Washington, DC. Jason Harrow, Gerstein Harrow LLP, Los Angeles, California. James Crooks, Fairmark Partners, LLP, Washington, DC.
For defendant: For Defendant PoolTogether, Inc: Kevin P. Broughel, Paul Hastings LLP, New York, New York. For Defendants Dharma Labs, Inc., and Ozone Networks, Inc.: JOHN P. AMATO, Thomas Coburn Hahn & Hessen LLP, New York, New York. For Defendant Leighton Cusack: Andrew W. Blackwell, St. Louis, Missouri. For Defendants Dragonfly Digital Management, LLC, and Compound Labs, Inc.: Jason Gottlieb, Morrison Cohen LLP, New York, New York. For Defendants Nascent US, LLC, and Nascent Limited Partnership: Brian E. Klein, Waymaker LLP, Los Angeles, California. For Defendants Stichting Maven 11 Funds, Galaxy Digital Trading HK Limited, LP, and ParaFi Capital, LP: Sean Hecker, Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP, New York, New York.
Case number: 21-CV-6025

Illegal Cryptocurrency Lottery Claimant Lacks Article III Standing; No Concrete Harm

Appellate Division, First Department: December 19, 2022
Publication Date: 2022-12-19
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:December 15, 2022

Law Journal Press | Digital Book District of Columbia Legal Malpractice Law 2024 Authors: Shari L. Klevens, Alanna G. Clair View this Book

View more book results for the query "Hahn Hessen"

Appellate Division,First Department: October 18, 2022
Publication Date: 2022-10-20
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:October 18, 2022

Appellate Division, First Department
Publication Date: 2022-06-27
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:June 22, 2022

February 07, 2022 | The American Lawyer

The Nitty-Gritty of Big Law Mergers: Making the Tech Work in 3 Recent Tie-Ups

Chief information officers at Holland & Knight, Dinsmore & Shohl and Thompson Coburn share merger lessons.
6 minute read
Lynch v. Jacobs
Publication Date: 2021-12-07
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Michael D. Lynch, Candence B. Lynch, pro se appellants
For defendant: Miami, FL. Victoria A. Guilfoyle, Brian J. Hall, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mark S. Indelicato, Jeffrey Zawadski, Hahn Hessen LLP, New York, NY for appellee.
Case number: D69637

Because appellants attempted to re-litigate arguments that were already considered and rejected by the court, their motion to basically re-open their bankruptcy matter failed to satisfy the requirements of either Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) or 60(b).

December 01, 2021 | The Recorder

Arent Fox and Schiff Hardin to Merge, Creating a New Am Law 100 Powerhouse

Effective March 1, the new firm will be home to more than 600 lawyers and policy professionals with offices in seven U.S. markets—including the Northern and Southern California legal markets.
5 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • The Essential Guide to Governance, Risk, and Compliance

    Brought to you by Diligent Corporation

    Download Now

  • 2024 Trends Report Mid-Year Special Edition: Update on Outside Counsel Billing Rates

    Brought to you by LexisNexis® CounselLink®

    Download Now

  • AI in Private Equity: A Guide for Gaining an Early Advantage

    Brought to you by Ontra

    Download Now

  • Why Are So Many Law Firms Suddenly Embracing Digital Transformation?

    Brought to you by AllRize

    Download Now