Employer and its workers' compensation insurer could assert a lien against compensation obtained from the employer's underinsured motorist coverage.

Replacement cost value provision in moving contract limiting company's liability for damage or loss was valid and enforceable where it met statutory requirements, as the law did not require an accurate valuation of property where customer had opportunity to negotiate or state a value.

Employer's workers' compensation insurer was not entitled to assert a lien on any underinsured motorist coverage recovery obtained by an injured worker from the employer's auto insurer, where the Workers' Compensation Act only permitted reimbursement from a third-party tortfeasor or their insurer.

The court held that plaintiff LP was an insured under the policy entered into by the condominium council because a director of the LP was a member of the council.

The court denied a motion to intervene by a workers' compensation carrier because it did not have a right to assert its lien against plaintiff's underinsured motorist benefits.

The Industrial Accident Board erred in awarding attorneys' fees that exceeded 30 percent of the amount on an "issue" in which a claimant obtained a recovery greater than that offered by the employer prior to hearing.

The exclusivity provision of the Workers' Compensation Act did not prevent an employee who received workers' compensation benefits from also receiving underinsured motorist benefits under an employer's automobile liability policy which was purchased from a third-party insurance company.