Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
February 12, 2024 | The Recorder

Sun-Maid's 'Yogurt-Covered' Raisin Accused of Falsely Advertising Product as 'Healthy Snack'

This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar, ALM's source for immediate alerting on just-filed cases in state and federal courts. Law.com Radar now offers state court coverage nationwide. Sign up today and be among the first to know about new suits in your region, practice area or client sector.
3 minute read
M.H. v. Starbucks Coffee Co.
Publication Date: 2023-08-22
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Gregory H. Woods
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1:22-cv-10507

Starbucks Is Not Liable for Employee Misconduct Under NYS Human Rights Law

March 24, 2023 | The Legal Intelligencer

Kirkland & Ellis to Rep Teva in Pending Antitrust Class Action

This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
2 minute read
Cardwell v. Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Publication Date: 2023-02-28
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Legal Services
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Gregory H. Woods
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1:19-cv-10256

Jury Could Find Some Law Firm Defendants Retaliated Against Plaintiff for Complaining

Bozdogan v. 23 Ludlam Fuel Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-01-06
Practice Area: Attorney Compensation | Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
Judge: Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiff: Justin M. Reilly, Esq., The NHG Law Group, P.C., Massapequa, NY.
For defendant: Attorney for Defendants: Jeffrey H. Weinberger, Esq., Law Office of Steven Cohn, P.C., Carle Place, NY.
Case number: 16-CV-1053

Reduction of Attorney's Fee Explained in Award of $154,945 to Pay Suit's Prevailing Party

In re Seroquel XR Antitrust Litig.
Publication Date: 2022-07-19
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry: Pharmaceuticals | Retail | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Carmella P. Keener, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Bruce E. Gerstein, Joseph Opper, Kimberly M. Hennings, Daniel Litvin, Garwin Gerstein & Fisher LLP, New York, NY; Peter R. Kohn, Joseph T. Lukens, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, Philadelphia, PA; David F. Sorensen, Caitlin G. Coslett, Berger Montague PC, Philadelphia, PA; Stuart E. Des Roches, Amanda Hass, Chris Letter, Dan Chiorean, Thomas J. Maas, Odom & Des Roches, LLC, New Orleans, LA; Susan C. Segura, Erin R. Leger, David C. Raphael, Jr., Smith Segura Raphael & Leger, LLP, Alexandria, LA; Russell A. Chorush, Heim Payne & Cho Rush, LLP, Houston, TX; Michael J. Barry, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilmington, DE; Robert G. Eisler, Deborah A. Elman, Chad B. Holtzman, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., New York, NY; Sharon K. Robertson, Donna M. Evans, Matthew W. Ruan, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, New York, NY; Michael J. Barry, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilmington, DE; Jayne A. Goldstein, Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP, Media, PA; J. Clayton Athey, Jason Wayne Rigby, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Barry L. Refsin, Alexander J. Egervary, Caitlin V. McHugh, Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, Philadelphia, PA; Monica L. Kiley, Eric L. Bloom, Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, Harrisburg, PA; J. Clayton Athey, Jason Wayne Rigby, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Scott E. Perwin, Lauren C. Ravkind, Anna T. Neil, Kenny Nachwalter, P.A., Miami, FL; Heidi M. Silton, Jessica N. Servais, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN; Peter Safirstein, Safirstein Metcalf LLP, New York, NY; Archana Tamoshunas, Taus, Cebulash & Landau, LLP, New York, NY; Lee Albert, Brian D. Brooks, Glancy, Prongay, & Myrray, New York, NY; Robert J. Kriner, Jr., Tiffany Joanne Cramer, Chimicles Schwartz Kriner & Donaldson-Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; Dianne M. Nast, Joseph N. Roda, Michael D. Ford, NastLaw, Philadelphia, PA; Michael L. Roberts, Stephanie E. Smith, Roberts Law Firm US, PC, Little Rock, AR for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Daniel M. Silver, Alexandrea M. Joyce, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; John E. Schmidtlein, Benjamin M. Greenblum, Colette T. Connor, Thomas S. Fletcher, Akhil K. Gola, Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC; Arthur G. Connolly, III, Alan Richard Silverstein, Connolly Gallagher LLP, Wilmington, DE; Christopher J. Marino, James E. Gallagher, Davis Malm & D'Agostine, P.C., Boston, MA; Jack B. Blumenfeld, Michael J. Flynn, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stephen J. McIntyre, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Brett J. Williamson, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Newport Beach, CA; Ben Bradshaw, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, DC; John W. Shaw, Karen E. Keller, Nathan Roger Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; Thomas J. Lang, Christina E. Fahmy, Peter M. Boyle, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case number: D69888

Antitrust claims arising from alleged reverse payment agreements were timely under the statute of limitations where each alleged supracompetitive sale constituted a discrete act that started the limitations period for that sale.

Appellate Division,First Department
Publication Date: 2022-06-23
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:June 21, 2022

March 24, 2022 | Law.com

Dipping Demand Could Spell Danger for Many Firms: The Morning Minute

The news and analysis you need to start your day.
6 minute read
March 16, 2022 | Law.com

Who Got the Work?℠: Clifford Chance Guides $2.6B Buy of Bayer Business and More

Welcome to "Who Got the Work?℠," a weekly column that highlights the law firms and lawyers around the country who are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
9 minute read
Castle Restoration LLC v. Castle Restoration & Constr. Inc.
Publication Date: 2022-02-17
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Construction
Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk
Judge: Justice Elizabeth Emerson
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff: Law Office of Matthew F. Didora, P.C., Garden City, New York.
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendants Castle Restoration & Construction, Inc., and Robert P. Castaldi: Forchelli Deegan Terrana, LLP, Uniondale, New York.
Case number: 016349-15

Plaintiff Fails to Show It Performed Its Own Obligations Under Agreement

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now

    • Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms

      Brought to you by Ontra

      Download Now